Constitutional Accountability Center Hails Appeals Court Ruling Upholding Health Care Reform and Vote By Conservative Judge

CAC President Doug Kendall: “Judge Jeffrey Sutton has done his job, and in doing so has transformed the debate over the Affordable Care Act and powerfully advanced the cause of judicial independence.”

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has upheld the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement:

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “Today’s ruling is the first appellate court judgment on the Affordable Care Act and the Sixth Circuit got it right.”

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “In a thoughtful, measured opinion today rejecting a constitutional challenge to health care reform, Judge Jeffrey Sutton — appointed by President George W. Bush — has transformed the debate over the constitutionality of health care reform from a partisan fight into a legal dispute, one in which, as Sutton recognized, ‘the government has the better of the arguments.’”

CAC President Kendall concluded, “Judge Sutton has done his job, and in doing so has powerfully advanced the cause of judicial independence.”

#

Resources:

CAC President Doug Kendall: “Health Care Reform: Preserving Judicial Independence in a Partisan Age,” June 3, 2011: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/health-care-reform-preser_b_870988.html

Sixth Circuit opinion in Thomas More Law Center v. Obama, upholding the constitutionality of health care reform: http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/11a0168p-06.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from

Rule of Law
August 8, 2024

August Newsletter: CAC Experts Helped Break Down a Major Term at the Supreme Court

Rule of Law
September 8, 2024

Justice delayed is political: Trump’s election interference case must continue ahead of the election

Salon
The Supreme Court conservative majority’s opinion in Trump v. United States has rightly drawn considerable criticism.  Its...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Donald K. Sherman
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 5, 2024

“Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review”

Election Law Blog
David Gans, Brianne Gorod, and Anna Jessurun have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Boston College Law Review)....
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Anna Jessurun, Rick Hasen
Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202

In In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying...