Constitutional Accountability Center Hails Appeals Court Ruling Upholding Health Care Reform and Vote By Conservative Judge

CAC President Doug Kendall: “Judge Jeffrey Sutton has done his job, and in doing so has transformed the debate over the Affordable Care Act and powerfully advanced the cause of judicial independence.”

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has upheld the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement:

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “Today’s ruling is the first appellate court judgment on the Affordable Care Act and the Sixth Circuit got it right.”

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “In a thoughtful, measured opinion today rejecting a constitutional challenge to health care reform, Judge Jeffrey Sutton — appointed by President George W. Bush — has transformed the debate over the constitutionality of health care reform from a partisan fight into a legal dispute, one in which, as Sutton recognized, ‘the government has the better of the arguments.’”

CAC President Kendall concluded, “Judge Sutton has done his job, and in doing so has powerfully advanced the cause of judicial independence.”

#

Resources:

CAC President Doug Kendall: “Health Care Reform: Preserving Judicial Independence in a Partisan Age,” June 3, 2011: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/health-care-reform-preser_b_870988.html

Sixth Circuit opinion in Thomas More Law Center v. Obama, upholding the constitutionality of health care reform: http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/11a0168p-06.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.
Rule of Law
February 4, 2026

‘This Occupation Has to End!’ Omar Argues After Homan Says Most Agents Will Stay in Minnesota

Common Dreams
“Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota,” the congresswoman said. “The...
Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pitchford v. Cain

In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
Rule of Law
January 29, 2026

We, the People: Defending the U.S. Constitution As Immigration Raids Threaten Basic Rights

TriplePundit
With administration officials saying agents are immune to accountability, many are understandably wondering: What rights...
Rule of Law
January 30, 2026

CAC Release: Lemon Arrest the Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on the First Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Praveen Fernandes