Constitutional Accountability Center Hails Unanimous Ruling By the Supreme Court Rejecting Challenge to Beach Protection

DATE:  June 17, 2010                                                    
CONTACT:  Doug Kendall, 202-296-6889

 

Constitutional Accountability Center Hails Unanimous Ruling By the Supreme Court Rejecting Challenge to Beach Protection

WASHINGTON, DC — The Supreme Court today unanimously rejected an absurd takings claim by a handful of Florida property owners who objected to a beach restoration project on Florida’s Gulf Coast that not only restored eroded beaches, but also enhanced property values (something most property owners, unsurprisingly, supported).  Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), along with the State and Local Legal Center, filed a brief in this case in support of Florida on behalf of local government organizations, and today CAC’s President Doug Kendall hailed the Court’s ruling:

“The Court’s ruling today supports Florida’s efforts to restore eroded beaches and preserves the ability of state and local governments to respond to changing environmental conditions.  As the oil spill now ravaging our Nation’s coastlines vividly demonstrates, it is crucially important that the government have the authority to step in to protect our beaches and coastal communities. This case wasn’t about property rights – most landowners on the Gulf Coast favored Florida’s multi-million dollar effort to preserve the beach – it was about a few holdouts seeking to put the brakes on a popular government program.  While the Supreme Court is sharply divided ideologically in takings cases, every Justice wisely recognized there was no merit to the landowners’ claim in this case.”

###

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

More from

Environmental Protection
December 10, 2024

RELEASE: Some Justices Seem Skeptical of Most Extreme Arguments Seeking to Limit the Scope of the National Environmental Policy Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Seven County...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Gutierrez v. Saenz

In Gutierrez v. Saenz, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal court, as part of its analysis of a Section 1983 plaintiff’s standing to pursue a procedural due process claim against state officials, must...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Kentucky v. EPA

In Kentucky v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Rule of Law
December 5, 2024

Alarm raised over Trump plot to install nominees without Senate approval

AlterNet
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect...