Constitutional Accountability Center Hails Unanimous Ruling By the Supreme Court Rejecting Challenge to Beach Protection

DATE:  June 17, 2010                                                    
CONTACT:  Doug Kendall, 202-296-6889

 

Constitutional Accountability Center Hails Unanimous Ruling By the Supreme Court Rejecting Challenge to Beach Protection

WASHINGTON, DC — The Supreme Court today unanimously rejected an absurd takings claim by a handful of Florida property owners who objected to a beach restoration project on Florida’s Gulf Coast that not only restored eroded beaches, but also enhanced property values (something most property owners, unsurprisingly, supported).  Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), along with the State and Local Legal Center, filed a brief in this case in support of Florida on behalf of local government organizations, and today CAC’s President Doug Kendall hailed the Court’s ruling:

“The Court’s ruling today supports Florida’s efforts to restore eroded beaches and preserves the ability of state and local governments to respond to changing environmental conditions.  As the oil spill now ravaging our Nation’s coastlines vividly demonstrates, it is crucially important that the government have the authority to step in to protect our beaches and coastal communities. This case wasn’t about property rights – most landowners on the Gulf Coast favored Florida’s multi-million dollar effort to preserve the beach – it was about a few holdouts seeking to put the brakes on a popular government program.  While the Supreme Court is sharply divided ideologically in takings cases, every Justice wisely recognized there was no merit to the landowners’ claim in this case.”

###

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...