Immigration and Citizenship

Constitutional Accountability Center Statement on Supreme Court’s Split Decision in Arizona Immigration Case

CAC President Doug Kendall: “Today’s decision is a near-complete vindication of the federal government’s authority to establish uniform rules that guide immigration policy in this country.”

SUPREME COURT PLAZA (Washington, DC) – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court this morning handed down a ruling in the Arizona SB 1070 immigration case, striking down three sections and requiring an important limitation on the fourth, Constitutional Accountability Center President Doug Kendall – who was in the Court to listen to the opinions be read – released the following statement:

 

“Today’s decision is a near-complete vindication of the federal government’s authority to establish uniform rules that guide immigration policy in this country.  While Justice Kennedy soberly explained why the law prohibited Arizona’s effort to take immigration law into its own hands, Justice Scalia responded with a political diatribe better suited for Fox News than the Supreme Court.”

 

UPDATE: Following her appearance on MSNBC immediately after this morning’s decision, CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “By continuing to block three of the four challenged provisions of Arizona’s anti-immigrant law, the Court today issued a victory for the Constitution and the American people.  While it is troubling that the Court allowed the ‘show me your papers’ provision to go into effect, I am hopeful that this is merely a victory delayed, as the Court made clear that legal challenges, including ones alleging racial profiling, against the provision could and will continue.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

*  For a pre-rebuttal of Justice Scalia’s attempt to link today’s ruling with President Barack Obama’s recent announcement about immigration enforcement priorities, read in today’s Huffington Post, “Obama’s Dream and the Right’s Crocodile Tears,” by Doug Kendall: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/obamas-dream-and-the-righ_b_1622313.html 

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Arizona v. U.S.:  http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/arizona-v-us-us-v-arizona/arizona-v-us 

 

“Arizona’s S.B. 1070 v. The Founders: CAC Files Brief in Historic Arizona Immigration Law Case,” December 22, 2010: http://theusconstitution.org/media/releases/arizonas-sb-1070-v-founders-cac-files-brief-historic-arizona-immigration-law-case 

 

Constitution at a Crossroads: “Federalism and Immigration: Will the Court Choose Federal Uniformity or States’ Rights in Immigration Law?” http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/crossroads/chapter-10-federalism-and-immigration-will-court-choose-federal-uniformity-or

 

“Arizona v. US Recap: Justices Skeptical of Aspects of SB 1070, Supportive of “Papers, Please” Provision,” Elizabeth Wydra, April 30, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1425/arizona-v-us-recap-justices-skeptical-aspects-sb-1070-supportive-%E2%80%9Cpapers-please%E2%80%9D

 

“Born Under the Constitution: Why Recent Attacks on Birthright Citizenship are Unfounded,” Elizabeth Wydra, March 31, 2011: http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/issue-brief/born-under-constitution-why-recent-attacks-birthright-citizenship-are

 

“Immigration and the Tea Party’s Efforts to Deny the Constitution’s Guarantee of Birthright Citizenship,” Elizabeth Wydra, July 22, 2010: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1853

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Kentucky v. EPA

In Kentucky v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Rule of Law
December 5, 2024

Alarm raised over Trump plot to install nominees without Senate approval

AlterNet
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Rule of Law
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Civil Rights and Democracy Groups Join Forces to Oppose Preemptive Recess Appointments

Dozens of organizations sign letter to Senate