Rule of Law

‘Constitutional progressives’ unveil new pledge

 

The National Law Journal
‘Constitutional progressives’ unveil new pledge
By David Ingram
September 14, 2011

 

Doug Kendall of the Constitutional Accountability Center 
Image: Diego M. Radzinschi / Legal Times

Politicians get asked all the time to sign pledges — about abortion, taxes and countless other issues. Now, a coalition of liberal legal groups is asking people to sign a new pledge “to support the whole Constitution.” 

The effort is designed to counter depictions of the Constitution from Tea Party organizations and conservatives in Congress who argue that the federal government has exceeded the limited powers the Constitution gives it. 

Doug Kendall, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, told reporters on a conference call this morning that “self-professed constitutional conservatives” are trying to build “a bridge back to the colonial era and the Articles of Confederation,” which preceded the Constitution. 

Kendall said politicians should pledge to uphold the Constitution, including all its amendments, rather than taking a pledge to support certain parts of the document or to oppose something like tax increases. 

“The Constitution needs to be and should be a document that unites Americans instead of dividing us along ideological lines,” Kendall said. 

About 12,000 people have signed the pledge, according to the coalition’s website, ConstitutionalProgressives.org. The seven-sentence pledge emphasizes how the Constitution “has been improved” by changes such as the 14th, 16th and 17th amendments. 

Other groups involved in the effort include the Center for American Progress and the People For the American Way Foundation. 

Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) wrote a letter this week to his colleagues endorsing the coalition’s ideas. The effort coincides with events centered around Constitution Day, which is Friday and marks the anniversary of the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia. 

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...