D.C. Circuit Panel Majority Duped By Opponents Of ACA

Washington, DC – In a startlingly unsound opinion issued this morning, two judges on a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the tax credits that make health insurance affordable for millions of Americans under the Affordable Care Act should not be available in the 36 states with exchanges run by the federal government. 

 

Constitutional Accountability Center, which wrote the brief on behalf of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, and every major committee chair involved in writing the ACA, as well as state officials from across America, documented that this result is wholly inconsistent with the purpose and structure of the Act. As dissenting Judge Harry Edwards wrote in response to a key part of the majority’s ruling:

 

This claim is nonsense, made up out of whole cloth. There is no credible evidence in the record that Congress intended to condition subsidies on whether a State, as opposed to HHS, established the Exchange. Nor is there credible evidence that any State even considered the possibility that its taxpayers would be denied subsidies if the State opted to allow HHS to establish an Exchange on its behalf.

 

Elizabeth Wydra, Chief Counsel of Constitutional Accountability Center, said, “No one – not the people who wrote the law in Congress, not those who implemented the law in the states – understood this law to work the way that two judges of the D.C. Circuit today said it does.”

 

Doug Kendall, President of Constitutional Accountability Center, added, “This decision represents ideological judging at its worst, misreading the text, structure, and purpose of the ACA, and the very dire consequences that will accompany this ruling if not reversed by higher courts. The en banc D.C. Circuit should vacate this disturbing decision as soon as possible.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

*  CAC “friend of the court” brief in Halbig v. Burwell (formerly Halbig v. Sebelius) on behalf of Senate Majority Leader Reid, House Democratic Leader Pelosi, committee chairs in office when the ACA was passed, plus state officials in office when the ACA was being debated: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Halbig-Amicus-Legislator-CAC.pdf 

 

*  “’Kick Millions Off Health Insurance’ To Save Four People . . . Nothing?” Simon Lazarus, May 28, 2014: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/2689/%E2%80%9Ckick-millions-health-insurance%E2%80%9D-save-four-people-nothing 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes