Rule of Law

D.C. Memo: Minnesota lawmakers at the center of GOP debt-relief bill drama

A 94-year-old Minnesota woman gets her day in court

The Supreme Court this week seems inclined to agree with a with a 94-year-old woman who said Hennepin County unfairly kept the equity she had in a condominium after the county sold it for back taxes.

The justices heard oral arguments in Tyler v. Hennepin County, a case brought by property rights advocates who say the state’s forfeiture law is unconstitutional.

During the lengthy oral arguments on Wednesday, both conservative and liberal justices seemed to agree.

“Are there any limits?” Justice Elena Kagan asked. “I mean, $5,000 tax debt, $5 million house. Take the house, don’t give back the rest?”

Geraldine Tyler lived for a decade in a one-bedroom condominium in Hennepin County. But she moved out of her home in 2010, while in her 80s, to live in an apartment in a senior community. While she lived in her condo, she paid her property taxes in a timely fashion. But after she left, she stopped paying those taxes.

By 2015, Tyler’s delinquent property taxes totaled $2,311, and penalties, costs and interest added an additional $12,689, for a total property-tax debt of $15,000. Hennepin County eventually seized Tyler’s condo and sold it for $40,000, keeping all the proceeds from the sale.

Minnesota and nine other states allow the sale of property for back taxes without compensating owners for the surplus “excess equity” that sale might generate. In most states, the surplus proceeds from such sales are returned to the owner.

The Supreme Court must now decide whether these states forfeiture laws violate the “takings” clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Tyler’s case attracted a broad coalition of ideological support of Tyler. Friend of the court briefs were filed by progressive groups, including the Constitutional Accountability Center and Public Citizen, as well as conservative, property rights advocates such as the Cato institute — which file its brief in conjunction with the American Civil Liberties Union – and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Even the Biden administration weighted in on Tyler’s side.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
January 12, 2026

Sanders Warns Powell Probe Part of Trump Plan to ‘Intimidate and Destroy’ All Critics

Common Dreams
Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday warned that the Trump administration’s targeting of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for criminal investigation was part of...
Rule of Law
January 6, 2026

CAC RELEASE: Five Years After the January 6th Attack, We Remember an Assault on Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon the fifth anniversary of the January 6th attack on the Capitol,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 2, 2026

Make 2026 the Year of Thomas Paine

The Nation
As America celebrates its 250th birthday, remember the founder who rallied the people against British...
Rule of Law
December 15, 2025

The Leadership Conference and 257 Other Groups Voice Strong Concerns About House Hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
December 15, 2025 The Honorable Chip Roy, Chairman The Honorable Mary Gay Scanlon, Ranking Member...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Rise Economy v. Vought

In Rise Economy v. Vought, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to defund the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are lawful.
Rule of Law
December 11, 2025

Not Above the Law Coalition Demands Accountability: Trump’s Illegal National Guard Deployments Threaten Democracy

Common Dreams
WASHINGTON - As the Senate Armed Services Committee holds a hearing on the Trump administration’s deployment...