Federal Courts and Nominations

OP-ED: Did Neil Gorsuch Pass Trump’s Abortion Litmus Test?

Do litmus tests help explain a Supreme Court nominee’s judicial philosophy or do they offend the idea of an independent judiciary?

As President Donald Trump prepares to speak to Congress tonight, that question casts a shadow over whatever he might say about his nominee to the Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch.

Americans have generally come to expect their president to examine a nominee’s judicial philosophy, ideology, and record – but not to pick nominees locked into a guaranteed series of votes on hot-button social issues. The reason behind this aversion to explicit litmus tests: we want judges to have an open mind and take cases as they come, not owe votes to the person who appointed them to the bench.

President Trump, however, is an unequivocal cheerleader for litmus tests, including his promise to nominate Supreme Court Justices who are “pro-life” and who would “automatically” vote to overturn Roe v. Wade – the landmark decision protecting a woman’s right to an abortion.

Trump defenders will remind us that Hillary Clinton had a “bunch of litmus tests” of her own. That’s true, and Clinton was wrong to have had them. But Trump is the President, not Clinton (as Trump never tires of reminding us). While Judge Gorsuch has apparently suggested in private meetings with Senators that he might not be eager to “automatically” overturn Roe, that runs headlong into Trump’s much-touted abortion litmus test.

Senators listening to Trump tonight, who are constitutionally obliged to advise and consent on Gorsuch’s nomination to the high court, will rightly want to know how to square Trump’s repeated invocation of litmus tests with Gorsuch’s statements in closed-door meetings with pro-choice Senators.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 31, 2023

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert says

Fox News
Some democrats compare Justice Clarence Thomas to ‘Uncle Tom’ and house slave in ‘Django Unchained’
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Brianna Herlihy
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 7, 2023

In Her First Term, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Came to Play’

The New York Times
From her first week on the Supreme Court bench in October to the final day...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Adam Liptak
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s continuing march to the right

Major legal rulings that dismantled the use of race in college admissions, undermined protections for...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Tierney Sneed
Federal Courts and Nominations
June 25, 2023

Federal judge defends Clarence Thomas in new book, rejects ‘pot shots’ at Supreme Court

A federal appeals court judge previously on short lists for the Supreme Court is taking the rare...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
May 1, 2023

Supreme Court, done with arguments, turns to decisions

Roll Call
The justices have released opinions at a slow rate this term, and many of the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Michael Macagnone