Donald Trump facing lawsuit from almost 200 Democrats claiming he violated US constitution

‘Trump has conflicts of interest in at least 25 countries, and it appears he’s using his presidency to maximise his profits,’ says Michigan congressman John Conyers

By Shehab Khan

Almost 200 Democratic members of the US congress are suing Donald Trump, claiming he has violated a clause of the US Constitution. 

The 196 politicians have alleged that by retaining interests in a global business empire, the US President has violated constitutional restrictions on taking gifts and benefits from foreign leaders.

The lawsuit has already drawn more congressional plaintiffs than any legal action previously taken against a president. 

Leading the legal effort was Michigan congressman John Conyers.

“Trump has conflicts of interest in at least 25 countries, and it appears he’s using his presidency to maximise his profits,” he said.

The 37-page congressional complaint contends that America’s founders were concerned that foreign powers could interfere with the country’s affairs.

They were particularly worried that “foreign states would give benefits and rewards to the nation’s chief executive to subvert his loyalty,” it says. 

As a result, they wrote the emoluments clause of the Constitution with language “both sweeping and unqualified,” it adds. 

      The language of that clause is widely interpreted as prohibiting any officeholder, including the president, from accepting a gift, payment or other benefit from a foreign state without the consent of Congress.

      News of the lawsuit came shortly after a poll revealed almost half of voters are in favour of Mr Trump being impeached.

      A total of 47 per cent of the people surveyed would support him being removed as president, while only 43 per cent would oppose it.

      “Voters have little faith that Donald Trump is telling the truth when it comes to the Russia investigation,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling, who conducted the survey.

      “Most go so far as to say they think he is a liar.”

      More from

      Rule of Law
      U.S. Supreme Court

      Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

      In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
      Rule of Law
      January 10, 2025

      TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

      C-SPAN
      [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
      Rule of Law
      January 14, 2025

      Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

      Newsweek
      With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
      By: Praveen Fernandes
      Immigration and Citizenship
      January 15, 2025

      Birthright Citizenship 101

      Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
      Access to Justice
      U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

      United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

      In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...
      Rule of Law
      January 10, 2025

      CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

      Bloomberg TV