Environmental Protection And Chief Justice John Roberts

Washington, DC –  One week before the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral argument in Michigan v. EPA – yet another challenge to the EPA’s authority to protect the air from pollution by electricity-generating power plants – Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing the latest Snapshot in its “Roberts at 10” project examining John Roberts’s first decade as Chief Justice of the United States: Roberts’s Environmental Law Record: It’s Not Good, But Don’t Count Him Out

 

Our new Snapshot looks at Chief Justice Roberts’s approach to questions of environmental protection by focusing on two broad categories of environmental law cases: those that affect the ability of individuals and organizations to sue to prevent or redress environmental harm, and those that affect the ability of governments to regulate pollutants and polluters.

 

Read the new “Roberts at 10” Snapshot and an excerpt here: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Environment.pdf 

 

When John Roberts was nominated to the Supreme Court, his record on the environment was the subject of significant discussion.  At the same time that many in the environmental community sounded the alarm, Roberts pointed, in part, to his significant work as an advocate in one environmental case in an effort to show that the environmental community could expect to receive a fair hearing from him—on that issue and more generally.  For much of his first decade on the Court, Roberts’s votes have called those assurances into question, as he has consistently voted against stronger environmental protections in the most controversial cases involving environmental interests.  Last Term, though, he joined two big decisions that were environmental wins.  With another significant environmental case on the Court’s docket this Term—and more sure to come in the near future—Roberts will no doubt have additional opportunities to weigh in on the meaning and proper application of the Nation’s environmental laws.  While it seems very unlikely that Chief Justice Roberts’s record in environmental law cases will end up being good, his vote still shouldn’t be counted out. 

 

#

 

Additional Resources:

 

Roberts at 10: A Look at the First Decade of John Roberts’s Tenure as Chief Justice (opening Snapshot): http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-A-Look-at-the-First-Decade.pdf 

 

Roberts at 10: Federal Power: The Evolving Story of John Roberts and Congress’s Commerce Clause and Spending Clause Powers: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Evolving-Story-of-John-Roberts-federal-power.pdf 

 

Roberts at 10: Campaign Finance and Voting Rights: Easier to Donate, Harder to Vote: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Easier-to-Donate-Harder-to-Vote.pdf 

 

Roberts at 10: Roberts’s Quiet, But Critical, Votes To Limit Women’s Rights: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Roberts-Quiet-But-Critical-Votes-To-Limit-Womens-Rights.pdf 

 

Roberts at 10: Roberts’s Consistent Votes to Close the Courthouse Doors: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Access-to-the-Courts.pdf 

 

Roberts at 10: Turning Back the Clock on Protections for Racial Equality: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts_at_10-Race_snapshot.pdf 

 

“Roberts at 10” experts available for interviews: CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod, and Civil Rights Director David Gans.

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Rule of Law
January 26, 2023

White House Under Pressure to Develop a ‘Plan B’ on Student Debt

Bloomberg News
WASHINGTON (TNS) — The Biden administration is under pressure from Capitol Hill lawmakers and student...
By: Smita Ghosh, By Nancy Cook and Akayla Gardne
Civil and Human Rights
January 22, 2023

TV (FNS): CAC’s Wydra Discusses the Legal Landscape of Abortion Rights on the 50th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade

Fox News Sunday
On January 22, 2022, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra appeared on the Fox News...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Environmental Protection
January 19, 2023

BLOG: Defending the Environment with Constitutional and Statutory Text and History

This Term, the Supreme Court is considering Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, an important environmental...
By: Joie Mills
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. James

In National Shooting Sports Foundation v. James, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether a New York gun regulation violates the Constitution’s Commerce Clause.
Rule of Law
January 16, 2023

Supreme Court’s 2 cases on Biden student loan forgiveness plan will begin in February

The Daily Orange
Oral arguments for Department of Education v. Brown and Biden v. Nebraska will begin in the U.S. Supreme Court...