Rule of Law

Friends of Court Draw Battle Lines Ahead of Health Care Arguments

By Marcia Coyle

 

Like armies mustering their best weapons, supporters and opponents of the Affordable Care Act once again have turned out at the U.S. Supreme Court to battle over a critical element of that health insurance law.

 

Fifty-two amicus briefs—21 supporting the challengers and 31 backing the Obama administration—are on record in King v. Halbig, which the justices will hear on March 4. The political, economic and social stakes are huge. If the challengers prevail, the law itself, enacted in 2010, could collapse.

 

 

On the challengers’ side, conservative-libertarian legal and political organizations dominate. Also supporting that side are six states, a number of legal scholars and 15 Republican members of Congress. On the other side are national health, insurance, hospital, education and labor organizations; Nobel economists; 22 states; nearly 100 state legislators; and U.S. House and Senate Democratic leaders.

 

 

House-Senate Democratic leaders and 100 state legislators

 

These include Democratic leaders involved in drafting the ACA and state lawmakers who debated whether to establish state exchanges. They point to evidence in the legislative record; reports by the Congressional Budget Office; and statements by the Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and other members of Congress indicating that they all understood that subsidies would be available on state or federal exchanges. Elizabeth Wydra of the Constitutional Accountability Center is counsel of record.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 4, 2026

Why Would President Trump Want to Celebrate the Declaration of Independence?

Common Dreams
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes wrote an op-ed for Common Dreams explaining the similarities between...
By: Praveen Fernandes