Rule of Law

Friends of Court Draw Battle Lines Ahead of Health Care Arguments

By Marcia Coyle

 

Like armies mustering their best weapons, supporters and opponents of the Affordable Care Act once again have turned out at the U.S. Supreme Court to battle over a critical element of that health insurance law.

 

Fifty-two amicus briefs—21 supporting the challengers and 31 backing the Obama administration—are on record in King v. Halbig, which the justices will hear on March 4. The political, economic and social stakes are huge. If the challengers prevail, the law itself, enacted in 2010, could collapse.

 

 

On the challengers’ side, conservative-libertarian legal and political organizations dominate. Also supporting that side are six states, a number of legal scholars and 15 Republican members of Congress. On the other side are national health, insurance, hospital, education and labor organizations; Nobel economists; 22 states; nearly 100 state legislators; and U.S. House and Senate Democratic leaders.

 

 

House-Senate Democratic leaders and 100 state legislators

 

These include Democratic leaders involved in drafting the ACA and state lawmakers who debated whether to establish state exchanges. They point to evidence in the legislative record; reports by the Congressional Budget Office; and statements by the Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and other members of Congress indicating that they all understood that subsidies would be available on state or federal exchanges. Elizabeth Wydra of the Constitutional Accountability Center is counsel of record.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nebraska v. EPA

In Nebraska v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Rule of Law
January 20, 2025

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV