Fundamental Right to Marry the Person of One’s Choice Protected by Equal Protection Clause, Says CAC Brief in California Marriage Equality Case

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra: “The Fourteenth Amendment was designed to destroy discriminatory traditions that deny persons equal rights under the law, not to perpetuate them in the name of the Constitution.”

Washington, DC – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center filed a “friend of the court” brief in the historic case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, demonstrating that the text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution compel the court to affirm U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker’s ruling that California’s Proposition 8, which denies the right of marriage to partners of the same sex, is unconstitutional.

Read CAC’s brief here: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/perry-v-schwarzenegger/9th-circuit-amicus-brief-perry-v-schwarzenegger

“The text and history of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee equality under the law and equality of rights for all persons – without exception,” said Elizabeth Wydra, Constitutional Accountability Center Chief Counsel. Rejecting Proposition 8 supporters’ argument that marriage has traditionally been defined as between a man and a woman, Wydra noted, “The Fourteenth Amendment was designed to destroy discriminatory traditions that deny persons equal rights under the law, not perpetuate them in the name of the Constitution.”

David Gans, Director of CAC’s Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program said, “The framers of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause recognized the right to marry the person of one’s choosing as a protected civil right inherent in liberty and freedom. By denying same-sex couples the right to marry, Proposition 8 violates this original meaning and the clear text of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Gans said.

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief amicus curiae in Perry v. Schwarzenegger: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/perry-v-schwarzenegger/9th-circuit-amicus-brief-perry-v-schwarzenegger

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

 

More from

Rule of Law
September 24, 2024

RELEASE: Senate Judiciary Committee Rightly Focuses on the Harms of Trump v. United States and Grapples with Damage Mitigation

WASHINGTON, DC – As the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, ‘When the President Does It, that...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
September 23, 2024

Sign On Letter: 75 Organizations Call to Overturn Supreme Court Presidential Immunity Ruling

September 23, 2024 The Honorable Richard Durbin, Chairman Ranking Member Lindsay Graham Honorable Members, Committee...
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 20, 2024

“Will the Supreme Court Revive the Dangerous Fringe Election Theory It Just Rejected?”

Election Law Blog
Anna Jessurun in Slate: As several scholars predicted, ISLT proponents have now seized on the language in Moore to...
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 19, 2024

Will the Supreme Court Revive the Dangerous Fringe Election Theory It Just Rejected?

Slate
From troubling election denialism to rampant misinformation about voter fraud, there are already multiple respects...
By: Anna Jessurun
Rule of Law
September 12, 2024

September 2024 Newsletter: CAC Fights in the Lower Courts to Support Voting Rights and the Legality of Progressive Policies

Immigration and Citizenship
September 10, 2024

Trump, Vance y estos congresistas latinos quieren acabar con la ciudadanía por nacimiento. ¿Pueden hacerlo?

Telemundo
Quien nace en territorio estadounidense es considerado ciudadano por la Constitución desde hace 156 años....