Gavin Grimm supporters filing flurry of briefs in Supreme Court transgender rights case

By Michael Walsh

Chase Strangio, an attorney representing high school student Gavin Grimm, said Thursday that his client and other transgender people will not acquiesce to second-class citizenship if his team ultimately loses their landmark transgender rights case at the Supreme Court.

Grimm is challenging his local school board’s policy regarding transgender bathroom use in Gloucester County School Board v. G.G. — arguing that the policy violates Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibit sex discrimination. The policy requires transgender students to use bathrooms that correspond with their biological sex as designated at birth rather than gender identity.

Strangio, who is a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s LGBT & AIDS project, led a teleconference Thursday to draw attention to the increasing number of supporters filing friend-of-the-court briefs with the Supreme Court. The ACLU expects thousands of supporters from communities across the U.S. to urge the court to reinforce the rights of transgender students and guarantee equal treatment under the law.

“People have figured out that it is not a big deal. It is not scary to include trans people in public life. Trans people are thriving in all aspects of society,” Strangio said. “People are weighing in to tell the court that standing with Gavin and ruling for trans rights is not only the legally sound thing to do, but the just thing to do and something that the country is ready for.”

The ACLU expects a great breadth of organizations and individuals to file amicus briefs — legal documents filed by non-litigants with a serious interest in the issue — throughout the day: medical associations, unions, artists, doctors, lawyers, scientists, government employees and so on. The Equality Federation, Apple, IBM, eBay, Microsoft, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the cities of New York and San Francisco, the National LGBT Bar Association and the Constitutional Accountability Center are among those who have already signed briefs.

The ACLU told Yahoo News it is expecting at least 17 briefs.

In a statement, New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said, “Every student deserves to feel safe and welcome in their school, regardless of their gender identity. Access to bathrooms and other essential facilities is a fundamental human right that should not be restricted or denied to anyone. New York City has long been a leader in the fight for LGBTQ equality, and we are proud to stand with transgender and gender non-conforming people across the country in the fight against discrimination.”

Yahoo News asked Strangio what kind of recourse this patchwork of pro-transgender-rights organizations might have to keep fighting for equality if the Supreme Court ultimately sides with the Gloucester County School Board.

“We’re hopeful and optimistic that we’ll have a favorable outcome for Gavin and for trans students across the country,” he replied. “No matter what, there’s a lot of ways to organize young people, trans students and trans individuals to enforce their rights.”

Strangio noted that constitutional questions regarding the rights of trans individuals are still being litigated in the courts.

“No matter what happens,” he continued, “nobody is going back into the shadows. Nobody is going to stop fighting and there’ll be many avenues for public and social change, as well as legal relief for the trans community.”

 

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Civil and Human Rights
July 18, 2026

Arnie Arnesen Attitude July 16 2026

Attitude with Arnie Arnesen
CAC’s David H. Gans joined The Attitude with Arnie Arnesen to discuss the Reconstruction Amendments. Listen...
Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...