GOP Asks Whether Obamacare Delays Are Illegal

“The President may not—consistent with the command that he faithfully execute the laws—unilaterally amend, waive, or suspend the law,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte.

 

By DYLAN GARCIA

 

(TRNS) — Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee called President Obama’s recent Obamacare delays into question during a hearing today on Capitol Hill.

 

“The administration has ignored the separation of powers and unilaterally granted itself the constitutional authority to amend the laws,” said Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.). “This raw assertion of authority goes beyond the power granted to the President.”

 

The President announced last month that Americans could keep non-qualifying healthcare plans for another year and called for a year-long delay on the mandate on employers to provide health insurance to employees. Both of those calls prompted today’s hearing.

 

“The President is trying to make laws at news conferences,” said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas).

 

Constitutional Accountability Center Senior Counsel Simon Lazarus defended Obama’s actions. He called the one year delays “routine, temporary course corrections.”

 

Several Democrats heard no testimony from witnesses, deciding to instead use their time to challenge the legitimacy of the hearing, calling it a “farce” and a “waste of time.”

 

“We are throwing laws to the wasteland at this hearing, for it has no sense to it,” said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas).

 

The hearing was briefly interrupted by outbursts from immigration reform advocates, known as DREAMers. They were quickly escorted out of the hearing room by Capitol Police.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes