GOP Asks Whether Obamacare Delays Are Illegal

“The President may not—consistent with the command that he faithfully execute the laws—unilaterally amend, waive, or suspend the law,” said House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte.

 

By DYLAN GARCIA

 

(TRNS) — Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee called President Obama’s recent Obamacare delays into question during a hearing today on Capitol Hill.

 

“The administration has ignored the separation of powers and unilaterally granted itself the constitutional authority to amend the laws,” said Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.). “This raw assertion of authority goes beyond the power granted to the President.”

 

The President announced last month that Americans could keep non-qualifying healthcare plans for another year and called for a year-long delay on the mandate on employers to provide health insurance to employees. Both of those calls prompted today’s hearing.

 

“The President is trying to make laws at news conferences,” said Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas).

 

Constitutional Accountability Center Senior Counsel Simon Lazarus defended Obama’s actions. He called the one year delays “routine, temporary course corrections.”

 

Several Democrats heard no testimony from witnesses, deciding to instead use their time to challenge the legitimacy of the hearing, calling it a “farce” and a “waste of time.”

 

“We are throwing laws to the wasteland at this hearing, for it has no sense to it,” said Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas).

 

The hearing was briefly interrupted by outbursts from immigration reform advocates, known as DREAMers. They were quickly escorted out of the hearing room by Capitol Police.

More from

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.
Rule of Law
February 4, 2026

‘This Occupation Has to End!’ Omar Argues After Homan Says Most Agents Will Stay in Minnesota

Common Dreams
“Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota,” the congresswoman said. “The...
Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pitchford v. Cain

In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
Rule of Law
January 29, 2026

We, the People: Defending the U.S. Constitution As Immigration Raids Threaten Basic Rights

TriplePundit
With administration officials saying agents are immune to accountability, many are understandably wondering: What rights...
Rule of Law
January 30, 2026

CAC Release: Lemon Arrest the Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on the First Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Praveen Fernandes