Federal Courts and Nominations

Gorsuch calls for embrace of ‘din of democracy’ as protesters criticize his Trump Hotel appearance

By Debra Cassens Weiss

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch called for tolerance of diverse viewpoints while protesters outside criticized his appearance Thursday night at the Trump International Hotel in Washington D.C.

Gorsuch said the First Amendment guarantees that Americans “can say pretty much anything they want,” but with that right comes responsibility to tolerate diverse views. The New York Times and the Washington Post covered Gorsuch’s keynote address to the Fund for American Studies. How Appealing links to additional coverage.

“We have to remember that those with whom we disagree even vehemently still have the best interest of the country at heart,” he said. “We have to remember that democracy depends on our ability to reason and work with those who hold very different views from our own. We have to learn how to not only tolerate different points of view but to cherish the din of democracy.”

Critics question the appearance because the hotel is run by the Trump organization. Hotel ownership is being cited in a lawsuit that contends President Donald Trump is violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution because he eventually profits when foreign governments pay for using his hotel rooms.

Elizabeth Wydra, president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, said Gorsuch’s decision to speak at the hotel was disappointing because Trump’s failure to divest hotels and other assets could end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Roger Ream, president of the Fund for American Studies, said the hotel was chosen to host the event before Trump became president.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche