Civil and Human Rights

Government Seeks Rehearing After Deadlocked Immigration Ruling

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Department of Justice filed a petition for rehearing at the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Texas, after the shorthanded Court issued a deadlocked non-decision in June that left intact a national injunction against President Obama’s immigration actions by a single U.S. District Court judge, Constitutional Accountability Center president Elizabeth Wydra released the following reaction:

 

“The Justice Department made exactly the right move today. By filing a petition for rehearing, the government is giving the Court the option of retaining the case so that the Justices can, if they wish, address this profoundly important issue as soon as it has nine Members again. Filing such a petition is unusual,” Wydra continued, “but we are in unusual times. Because we have a short-staffed Court unable to issue a decision on the DAPA program, a regional lower court has been able to put unprecedented constraints on the executive and stop a federal policy nationwide, affecting millions of American families. This petition highlights why the Senate leadership needs to stop its hyper-partisan gamesmanship and consider the President’s Supreme Court nominee, so the Court can fulfill its constitutional role of declaring what the law is.” 

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in U.S. v. Texas: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/united-states-v-texas-us-sup-ct

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Climate United Fund v. Citibank

In Climate United Fund v. Citibank, the en banc United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally abolish a mandatory grant program created by Congress.
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Oregon v. Landis

In Oregon v. Landis, the Ninth Circuit is considering when states may prosecute federal officers for state crimes.
Rule of Law
February 4, 2026

‘This Occupation Has to End!’ Omar Argues After Homan Says Most Agents Will Stay in Minnesota

Common Dreams
“Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota,” the congresswoman said. “The...
Criminal Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pitchford v. Cain

In Pitchford v. Cain, the Supreme Court is considering whether, under federal habeas law, the Mississippi Supreme Court unreasonably held that a criminal defendant waived his right to challenge racial bias in his jury selection.
Rule of Law
January 29, 2026

We, the People: Defending the U.S. Constitution As Immigration Raids Threaten Basic Rights

TriplePundit
With administration officials saying agents are immune to accountability, many are understandably wondering: What rights...
Rule of Law
January 30, 2026

CAC Release: Lemon Arrest the Trump Administration’s Latest Assault on the First Amendment

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the arrest of journalist Don Lemon, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Praveen Fernandes