Rule of Law

Health Care Reform Challengers Tested At Fourth Circuit

    Washington, DC – After observing today’s health care reform arguments in the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Elizabeth Wydra, Chief Counsel of Constitutional Accountability Center, released the following statement:

    “As demonstrated in today’s oral argument, the Affordable Care Act’s challengers have no answer to the Constitution’s text and history and long-established Supreme Court precedent dating to the founding era. Contrary to the claims of the Tea Party and their allies, the Constitution gives the federal government the power to enact a national solution to a national problem.

    Echoing Resolution Six from the Constitutional Convention — which sets forth the Framers’ direction that the federal government have powers to act where the states are separately incompetent — Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal explained that states are incapable of solving the health care crisis on their own.

    Anti-reform advocates failed to effectively address the common-sense point that Congress must be able to encourage individuals to obtain health insurance as part of a comprehensive effort to reform the national health care industry. As General Katyal said, ‘This case is really about a political dispute that is better addressed outside the courtroom.’

    This very point was made perfectly by Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, formerly the Chief Judge of the Fourth Circuit, who wrote in an earlier Commerce Clause case that ‘it cannot be that the mere expression of judicial derision for the efforts of the democratic branches is enough to discard them.’ There is no better rebuke to Judge Hudson’s opinion.”

#

Resources:

Constitutional Accountability Center’s brief filed in Cuccinelli v. Sebelius: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/virginia-ex-rel-cuccinelli-v-sebelius/4th-circuit-amicus-brief-virginia-ex-rel

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Rule of Law

Access to Justice
----- Supreme Court -----

Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia

In Crowther v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, the Supreme Court is considering whether employees of federally funded educational institutions can bring Title IX suits for sex discrimination.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Wridt v. City of New York

In Wridt v. City of New York, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the NYPD’s mass surveillance system is unconstitutional.
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2026

CAC Release: Todd Blanche’s Record Disqualifies Him From Serving as America’s Lawyer

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to this week’s confirmation hearings on Todd Blanche’s nomination to...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2026

Leadership Conference Sign-on Letter Opposing Confirmation of Todd Blanche

Reject the Confirmation of Todd Blanche as U.S. Attorney General    The Honorable Chuck Grassley,...