Health Care Reform: Constitutional Accountability Center Statement On Eve of Argument In 11th Circuit Court of Appeals

Washington, DC – In anticipation of tomorrow’s hearing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, reviewing U.S. District Court Judge Roger Vinson’s decision striking down the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement:

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “It is essential to note that over 150 state legislators from 26 states have filed a ‘friend of the court’ brief supporting the constitutionality of the Act and arguing that it is good policy for their states and constituents. While plaintiffs use Tea-Party-friendly ‘states’ rights’ rhetoric, and claim to represent the interests of the states in general, many states and state leaders strongly disagree with the challengers’ legal position and flawed, historically-inaccurate view of federalism. The Massachusetts Attorney General, in citing former Gov. Mitt Romney’s legislation as a positive example, is one of them,” Wydra said.

David Gans, Director of CAC’s Human Rights, Civil Rights, and Citizenship Program said, “Our Constitution establishes a national government of enumerated but broad powers, that allow Congress to fix the health care crisis. Within our federalist system, the states play a vital role as ‘laboratories of democracy,’ but the Constitution clearly grants Congress the power to pass legislation like the Affordable Care Act to regulate an industry that accounts for one-sixth of our nation’s economy.”

#

Resources:

Brief of 154 state legislators defending the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on originalist and federalism grounds: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/us-department-health-human-services-v-florida-florida-v-hhs/11th-circuit-amici-brief

The States, Health Care Reform, and the Constitution: http://theusconstitution.org/think-tank/issue-brief/states-health-care-reform-and-constitution-0

Doug Kendall, “Health Care Reform: Preserving Judicial Independence in a Partisan Age,” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-kendall/health-care-reform-preser_b_870988.html

Elizabeth Wydra, “Don’t Tread on Me? Not All States Think Health Care Reform Threatens States’ Rights,” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/dont-tread-on-me-not-all-_b_872425.html

Strange Brew: The Tea Party’s Errant Constitutional Attacks on Health Care Reform: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1829

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 11, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.