House, Senate Democrats sue Trump over business dealings

By Melissa Quinn

Nearly 200 Democrats in the House and Senate are suing President Trump, and charge that he violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause.

The lawmakers filed the suit in federal court Wednesday morning. It is the fourth legal action, and the second filed this week, challenging the president’s businesses and its dealings with foreign governments.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn, and Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., are the lead plaintiffs. Thirty senators and 166 members of the House joined the suit.

The Democrats allege Trump violated the Constitution’s emoluments clause, which prohibits the president from accepting gifts or money from foreign governments.

“As defendant makes countless other foreign policy decisions, he may similarly be influenced by how those decisions will affect his business pursuits,” the suit said. “And because defendant is not coming to Congress and identifying the emoluments he wishes to accept, the American people will have no way of knowing whether his actions as president reflect only his beliefs about what is best for the country, or whether they are partly motivated by personal financial considerations.”

The lawsuit cited numerous business ventures the president’s company has been involved in as potential violations of the emoluments clause. As examples, the Trump Organization has continued to profit from foreign governments, and the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., has hosted foreign diplomats and governments.

Additionally, state-owned entities are currently tenants of Trump Tower.

“[Trump’s] conduct deprives the American people of assurances that their highest elected official is pursuing their best interest with undivided loyalty,” the lawsuit stated.

The Democratic lawmakers are represented by the Constitutional Accountability Center, a liberal, legal nonprofit.

The new case was filed just two days after attorneys general for Maryland and the District of Columbia filed their own lawsuit in federal court arguing Trump violates the emoluments clause through his business dealings.

A government watchdog group also sued the president in January over his business dealings.

On Friday, the Justice Department urged the court to dismiss that suit.

More from

Rule of Law
August 8, 2024

August Newsletter: CAC Experts Helped Break Down a Major Term at the Supreme Court

Rule of Law
September 8, 2024

Justice delayed is political: Trump’s election interference case must continue ahead of the election

Salon
The Supreme Court conservative majority’s opinion in Trump v. United States has rightly drawn considerable criticism.  Its...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Donald K. Sherman
Voting Rights and Democracy
September 5, 2024

“Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review”

Election Law Blog
David Gans, Brianne Gorod, and Anna Jessurun have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Boston College Law Review)....
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Anna Jessurun, Rick Hasen
Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202

In In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying...