Access to Justice

In Clapper, Supreme Court Majority Turns Article III On Its Head

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, which tossed out of court a First Amendment challenge to a law establishing a secretive surveillance program on the basis that there was no proof of precisely who the government secretly targeted, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

Rochelle Bobroff, Director of CAC’s Access to Courts Program, said, “The Supreme Court majority goes through a series of contortions in order to deny Amnesty International and others the ability to challenge the constitutionality of this controversial surveillance program, making it unlikely that anyone will ever be able to mount such a challenge.  The court’s ruling relies on Article III of the Constitution, but turns it on its head, misinterpreting the Court’s role to hear important constitutional cases into a license to deny review.”

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra added, “The Court’s embrace of an overly restrictive ‘certainly impending’ standard will make it more difficult for litigants to access our federal courts, whether they are challenging a federal statute or seeking to hold a company liable for violating federal law.” 

 

#

 

Resources:

 

Constitutional Accountability Center’s “friend of the court” brief filed on the side of Respondents: http://www.scribd.com/doc/107052852/CAC-Clapper-Amicus  

 

“Clapper and the Constitutional Role of the Federal Judiciary,” Rochelle Bobroff, October 25, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1661/clapper-and-constitutional-role-federal-judiciary  

 

Clapper v. Amnesty International USA: Supreme Court to Resolve Key Court Access Issue In First Amendment Case,” Rochelle Bobroff, September 26, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1629/clapper-v-amnesty-international-usa-supreme-court-resolve-key-court-access-issue  

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Access to Justice

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...