Rule of Law

In Surprising Political Move, Supreme Court Takes Up Latest ACA Challenge

Washington, DC – The U.S. Supreme Court today decided to take up the case of King v. Burwell, part of the latest legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act.  In the King case, as well as a similar case now pending before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – Halbig v. Burwell – Constitutional Accountability Center represents Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, and other key leaders in Congress as well as state legislatures when the ACA was drafted, passed, and implemented. CAC issued the following reaction to this morning’s news: 

 

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “We are disappointed that at least four Justices decided to hear this case despite the lack of a circuit split and while this issue is still being actively litigated in the lower courts, but we remain very confident that the Court will ultimately find that both the text of the ACA and the intentions of Congress mandate a ruling for the federal government.”

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra continued, “The fact remains that this is a straightforward case about how we interpret statutes in this country.  No elected official in Congress or in the state legislatures at the time the ACA was passed held the view that the challengers are pushing today, and the members of Congress who shaped and drafted the law have gone on record in briefing in this case to set the record straight.  The challengers’ view isn’t in the text of the ACA and it runs directly contrary to the purpose of the law, making sure every American has access to affordable health insurance.  This challenge to the ACA gravely misconstrues the law, while threatening to leave millions of Americans without access to health care.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

*  “Friend of the court” briefs on behalf of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, former Senator Max Baucus, and other Members of Congress and state legislatures at the time the Affordable Care Act was drafted and passed:

 

—  King v. Burwell: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/King_v_Sebelius_CAC_Amicus_Final.pdf 

—  Halbig v. Burwell: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Halbig-Amicus-Legislator-CAC.pdf 

 

*  “Affordable Care Act opponents are cherry-picking their history,” Tom Harkin, Ron Wyden, Sander M. Levin, George Miller and Henry A. Waxman (all CAC clients except for Sen. Wyden), Washington Post, October 30, 2014: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/affordable-care-act-opponents-are-cherry-picking-their-history/2014/10/30/2199a04e-5fac-11e4-91f7-5d89b5e8c251_story.html 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV