Immigration and Citizenship

Justices in Evenwel Skeptical Of Disrupting Equal Representation For All Persons

Washington, DC – Constitutional Accountability Center attorneys were in the U.S. Supreme Court this morning during argument in Evenwel v. Abbott, a major voting rights case, and had the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “Our Constitution promises equal representation for all persons, and that point was emphasized powerfully today. Evenwel argues that representation should be based on the number of voters in a district, not persons, but as Justice Ginsburg emphasized, that was explicitly rejected in the debates over the Fourteenth Amendment. It is written into the Constitution that the whole population be represented—not just eligible voters, but every person, including children, legal non-citizen residents, and others who are unable to cast a ballot. There seemed to be little appetite from the Justices this morning to upend this quintessentially American system of equal representation.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “No court in history has ever accepted Evenwel’s radical claim, which would wreak havoc with the redistricting process and require a new kind of U.S. census. Justices from the right and left seemed to recognize that Evenwel’s claim has no basis in the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal protection of the laws to ‘any person,’ not merely voters – as pointed out explicitly by Justice Kagan. Evenwel’s plea to rewrite the Constitution’s guarantee of equality for all seemed to fall flat today.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Evenwel v. Abbott: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/evenwel-v-abbott-us-sup-ct 

 

“Up Next at the Supreme Court: A Challenge to Equality for All Americans,” David Gans, The New Republic, December 7, 2015: https://newrepublic.com/article/124955/next-supreme-court-challenge-equality-americans 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
By: Harith Khawaja
Rule of Law
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on Excessive Fines Clause Reaches the Wrong Result, But Gets the Standard Right

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pung v. Isabella County,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Rule of Law
June 22, 2026

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide Four Cases Defining Trump’s Power

The Wall Street Journal
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the major decisions left...
Rule of Law
June 21, 2026

Trump DOJ in CRISIS MODE

Legal AF
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss Todd Blanche's nomination...