Civil and Human Rights

Justices Show Skepticism Toward Fair Housing Act Challenge

Washington, DC – Following oral argument today in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, a critical dispute over the Fair Housing Act, Constitutional Accountability Center attorneys – who were inside the Court for today’s proceedings – issued the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “A majority of Justices today appeared to reject Texas’s attempt to limit the reach of the Fair Housing Act, with none other than Justice Scalia labeling the states’ interpretation of the law as ‘very strange.’ Justice Scalia correctly observed that it is hard to read the Fair Housing Act, passed in 1968 and amended since then in ways that acknowledge the existence of ‘disparate impact liability,’ not to allow for claims against practices that have a ‘discriminatory effect’ — practices that result in a disparate impact on a group of persons or create, increase, or reinforce segregated housing patterns — as well as those that are proven to be motivated by discriminatory intent.” Wydra added, “Scalia’s strong endorsement of the availability of disparate impact liability under the FHA was perhaps even more surprising than the protests that disrupted the start of the Court’s session this morning.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “Texas urged the Justices to use the case to rewrite federal civil rights law, but that invitation seemed to fall flat. The Justices recognized that disparate impact suits help eradicate barriers to equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Texas_Dept_of_Housing_v_Inclusive_Communities_Project_CAC_Merits_Amicus.pdf 

 

“Will the Supreme Court Honor Dr. King’s Legacy?,” Elizabeth Wydra, Huffington Post, January 20, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/will-the-supreme-court-ho_b_6509100.html

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Environmental Protection
December 10, 2024

RELEASE: Some Justices Seem Skeptical of Most Extreme Arguments Seeking to Limit the Scope of the National Environmental Policy Act

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Seven County...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Gutierrez v. Saenz

In Gutierrez v. Saenz, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal court, as part of its analysis of a Section 1983 plaintiff’s standing to pursue a procedural due process claim against state officials, must...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Kentucky v. EPA

In Kentucky v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Rule of Law
December 5, 2024

Alarm raised over Trump plot to install nominees without Senate approval

AlterNet
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect...