Civil and Human Rights

Justices Show Skepticism Toward Fair Housing Act Challenge

Washington, DC – Following oral argument today in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, a critical dispute over the Fair Housing Act, Constitutional Accountability Center attorneys – who were inside the Court for today’s proceedings – issued the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “A majority of Justices today appeared to reject Texas’s attempt to limit the reach of the Fair Housing Act, with none other than Justice Scalia labeling the states’ interpretation of the law as ‘very strange.’ Justice Scalia correctly observed that it is hard to read the Fair Housing Act, passed in 1968 and amended since then in ways that acknowledge the existence of ‘disparate impact liability,’ not to allow for claims against practices that have a ‘discriminatory effect’ — practices that result in a disparate impact on a group of persons or create, increase, or reinforce segregated housing patterns — as well as those that are proven to be motivated by discriminatory intent.” Wydra added, “Scalia’s strong endorsement of the availability of disparate impact liability under the FHA was perhaps even more surprising than the protests that disrupted the start of the Court’s session this morning.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “Texas urged the Justices to use the case to rewrite federal civil rights law, but that invitation seemed to fall flat. The Justices recognized that disparate impact suits help eradicate barriers to equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Texas_Dept_of_Housing_v_Inclusive_Communities_Project_CAC_Merits_Amicus.pdf 

 

“Will the Supreme Court Honor Dr. King’s Legacy?,” Elizabeth Wydra, Huffington Post, January 20, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/will-the-supreme-court-ho_b_6509100.html

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 19, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

State of Washington v. Trump

In State of Washington v. Trump, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...