Civil and Human Rights

Justices Show Skepticism Toward Fair Housing Act Challenge

Washington, DC – Following oral argument today in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, a critical dispute over the Fair Housing Act, Constitutional Accountability Center attorneys – who were inside the Court for today’s proceedings – issued the following reaction:

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “A majority of Justices today appeared to reject Texas’s attempt to limit the reach of the Fair Housing Act, with none other than Justice Scalia labeling the states’ interpretation of the law as ‘very strange.’ Justice Scalia correctly observed that it is hard to read the Fair Housing Act, passed in 1968 and amended since then in ways that acknowledge the existence of ‘disparate impact liability,’ not to allow for claims against practices that have a ‘discriminatory effect’ — practices that result in a disparate impact on a group of persons or create, increase, or reinforce segregated housing patterns — as well as those that are proven to be motivated by discriminatory intent.” Wydra added, “Scalia’s strong endorsement of the availability of disparate impact liability under the FHA was perhaps even more surprising than the protests that disrupted the start of the Court’s session this morning.”

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “Texas urged the Justices to use the case to rewrite federal civil rights law, but that invitation seemed to fall flat. The Justices recognized that disparate impact suits help eradicate barriers to equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Texas_Dept_of_Housing_v_Inclusive_Communities_Project_CAC_Merits_Amicus.pdf 

 

“Will the Supreme Court Honor Dr. King’s Legacy?,” Elizabeth Wydra, Huffington Post, January 20, 2015: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/will-the-supreme-court-ho_b_6509100.html

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes