Immigration and Citizenship

Justices Skeptical Of Aspects Of Arizona’s SB 1070 Law

Echoing CAC Brief, Constitution’s Text, History and Structure Key Issues In Argument

Washington, DC – After attending today’s arguments at the Supreme Court over the constitutionality of Arizona’s SB 1070 anti-immigration law, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement.

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “Solicitor General Verilli effectively explained why SB 1070 threatens the federal government’s foreign policy and immigration authority, and why the law conflicts with the Founders’ design. The Constitution demands ‘uniform’ federal rules on naturalization and immigration, and Arizona’s law fundamentally disrupts this uniformity.”

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “SB 1070 is a single-minded, aggressive ‘attrition through enforcement’ policy that directly conflicts with the Constitution’s delegation of immigration authority to the federal government.  The nation’s Founders unmistakably gave the national government the power to speak for the United States on immigration matters and foreign affairs,” Wydra continued, “and it appeared that a majority of the justices had problems with at least some provisions of the Arizona law.  Hopefully, the justices will recognize that all of the challenged provisions should fail for the same reason: Arizona does not have the right to put in place its own ‘attrition through enforcement’ immigration policy.”

#

Resources:

*  CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Arizona v. United States:  http://theusconstitution.org/cases/briefs/arizona-v-us-us-v-arizona/arizona-v-us

*  Elizabeth Wydra, Huffington Post (front page), “Arizona’s ‘Show Me Your Papers’ Law Gets Its Day in Court — and Congress,” April 24, 2012:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/arizonas-show-me-your-pap_b_1449460.html

*  Elizabeth Wydra, New York Times, “The Constitution Settles It,” April 22, 2012: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/04/22/how-states-should-approach-immigration/the-constitution-limits-states-immigration-policy

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV