Federal Courts and Nominations

Lankford is playing politics with Supreme Court nomination

Regarding “Kudos to Lankford” (ScissorTales, April 23): On the 21st anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing, 15 of Judge Merrick Garland’s former colleagues on the bombing investigation and prosecution sent a letter to U.S. Senate leaders in enthusiastic support of Garland’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. Former federal prosecutor Donna Bucella recalled walking with Garland through the Murrah Building. “We went to the day care center” Bucella said. “Neither of us said anything, not until about 20 years later, about the emotional impact of that sight.” She added, “Merrick Garland is dedicated to following the rule of law.”

 

In a speech, Sen. Patrick Leahy echoed this by recalling perhaps the most iconic photo of that day, of a firefighter cradling Baylee Almon. Anyone who watches Leahy’s speech can see he spoke only with the utmost respect and reverence.

 

If anyone is “playing politics” with the Supreme Court, it is Sen. Lankford and his Republican colleagues, who are blocking Garland from even getting a hearing and a yes-or-no vote. America needs a fully staffed, fully functioning Supreme Court that can decide cases of profound importance to law enforcement and prosecutors who keep our nation safe, while ensuring that the people’s constitutional rights are protected. It is time for Lankford to do his job and call for hearings and a vote.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche