Immigration and Citizenship

Members of Congress Ask Justices: Stop Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban Overreach

Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (DE) and Representative Zoe Lofgren (CA) – who previously led 165 Members of Congress in a brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit – today filed a new “friend of the court” brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii. Coons and Lofgren ask the Justices to halt President Trump’s latest attempt to implement his Muslim travel ban against grandparents and other close family relatives of certain immigrants, as well as refugees who have a bona fide relationship to the United States.

Read the brief filed today here.

“The Trump Administration’s position defies common sense,” said CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod, “and nothing in the law justifies their arbitrary line-drawing. To argue that someone’s grandmother does not count as a ‘close familial relationship’ – as outlined by the Supreme Court in its order handed down last month – is both irrational and inexcusable.”

“The Trump Administration’s view is out of step with how closely most families across the globe hold relatives such as grandparents,” added CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans. “In fact, the Supreme Court has expressly described ‘uncles, aunts, cousins, and especially grandparents’ as ‘close relatives.’ Moreover, the Trump Administration’s banning of refugees who can demonstrate a bona fide relationship with the United States tramples on the language of the Court’s order last month, and practically demands the Court’s rebuke.”

#

Resources:

CAC “friend of the court” brief on behalf of Members of Congress in Trump v. Hawaii: https://www.theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Hawaii_v_Trump_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

“Muslim travel ban 2.0: just as unconstitutional as version 1.0,” Elizabeth Wydra, Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 30, 2017: http://www.richmond.com/opinion/their-opinion/guest-columnists/eilzabeth-wydra-column-muslim-travel-ban-just-as-unconstitutional-as/article_c28f22d8-5d98-5c6e-9c2c-c3b662f77291.html 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...