Immigration and Citizenship

Members of Congress Ask Justices: Stop Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban Overreach

Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (DE) and Representative Zoe Lofgren (CA) – who previously led 165 Members of Congress in a brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit – today filed a new “friend of the court” brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii. Coons and Lofgren ask the Justices to halt President Trump’s latest attempt to implement his Muslim travel ban against grandparents and other close family relatives of certain immigrants, as well as refugees who have a bona fide relationship to the United States.

Read the brief filed today here.

“The Trump Administration’s position defies common sense,” said CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod, “and nothing in the law justifies their arbitrary line-drawing. To argue that someone’s grandmother does not count as a ‘close familial relationship’ – as outlined by the Supreme Court in its order handed down last month – is both irrational and inexcusable.”

“The Trump Administration’s view is out of step with how closely most families across the globe hold relatives such as grandparents,” added CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans. “In fact, the Supreme Court has expressly described ‘uncles, aunts, cousins, and especially grandparents’ as ‘close relatives.’ Moreover, the Trump Administration’s banning of refugees who can demonstrate a bona fide relationship with the United States tramples on the language of the Court’s order last month, and practically demands the Court’s rebuke.”

#

Resources:

CAC “friend of the court” brief on behalf of Members of Congress in Trump v. Hawaii: https://www.theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Hawaii_v_Trump_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

“Muslim travel ban 2.0: just as unconstitutional as version 1.0,” Elizabeth Wydra, Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 30, 2017: http://www.richmond.com/opinion/their-opinion/guest-columnists/eilzabeth-wydra-column-muslim-travel-ban-just-as-unconstitutional-as/article_c28f22d8-5d98-5c6e-9c2c-c3b662f77291.html 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV