Rule of Law

NCGA Dems weigh in on health care suit

Posted by Mark Binker

Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 2:49 pm

Greensboro Reps. Alma Adams and Pricey Harrison are two of the 30 North Carolina legislative Democrats who have signed on to an amicus brief supporting the Affordable Care Act in a suit that is before the U.S. Supreme Court. The ACA is better known in some circles as “ObamaCare” or the national health care reform law.

According to Rep. Verla Insko, a Chapel Hill Democrat who rounded up the North Carolina signatures, 452 state lawmakers from 48 states have signed onto the brief. The brief was organized by the Progressive States Network and Constitutional Accountability Center, Insko said.

An amicus brief is also known as a friend of the court brief. It allows people and organizations who are not party to the case on appeal to give the justices their thoughts on the case. Michael Gerhardt, a UNC law professor who attended Insko’s news conference today, says there’s some evidence that amici briefs can help sway the court, particularly if they come from a variety of sources.

The brief that Harrison, Adams and others signed onto lays out why the lawmakers think the law is constitutional, including a requirement that individuals buy health insurance and that states expand their Medicaid programs.

I asked Harrison if she thought that she would alienate some voters by backing a law that is unpopular in many circles. She pointed out that the conservative voters mostly likely to oppose the federal health care law weren’t really her base to begin with.

“I think I lost them already,” Harrison said, adding that she had been an outspoken supporter of the Obama administration. “I’m not going to back away from that.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 29, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...