Nearly 200 congressional Democrats sue Donald Trump over the emoluments clause

By Emily Singer

A massive group of congressional Democrats plans to file a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, alleging he’s in violation of the Constitution for keeping his stake in his foreign businesses, the Washington Post reported.

The lawsuit — filed by 196 Democratic members of Congress — says Trump is in violation of the emoluments clause, which bans lawmakers from accepting “any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state” without the consent of Congress.

The lawmakers are seeking to stop Trump from “accepting any benefits from foreign states without first obtaining congressional consent,” according to the text of the lawsuit obtained by the Washington Post.

The lawsuit comes days after the attorneys general from Maryland and Washington, D.C., also filed suit against Trump, alleging he’s in violation of anticorruption clauses in the Constitution.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has taken the lead on the lawsuit, with Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) leading the effort in the House. No Republicans have joined the lawsuit, but Blumenthal told the Washington Post that they are invited to.

The White House has not yet responded to the lawsuit.

But White House press secretary Sean Spicer said the suit filed by the Maryland and D.C. attorneys general was about “partisan politics.”

“I think the president’s interest, as previously discussed, do not violate the emoluments clause,” Spicer said in his June 12 press briefing.

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
April 29, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority, Once Again, Guts the Voting Rights Act and Further Enables Racial Discrimination in Voting

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Louisiana v. Callais, a...
By: David H. Gans
Access to Justice
April 28, 2026

CAC Release: In Cisco v. Doe Argument, Justices Grapple with the Scope of Liability Under Two Critical Human Rights Statutes

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Cisco Systems...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Harith Khawaja
Access to Justice
April 27, 2026

Human Rights Suit Over Cisco Work for China Heads to Supreme Court

Bloomberg Law
CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen was interviewed by Bloomberg Law about our brief in Cisco...
Criminal Law
April 27, 2026

CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Access to Justice
April 17, 2026

The Most Offensive Thing a Supreme Court Justice Can Do Is Be Honest About the Supreme Court

Balls & Strikes
This Week In Other Stuff We Appreciated Judges Overseeing Louisiana’s Landmark Oil Cases Have Financial...