Nearly 200 congressional Democrats sue Donald Trump over the emoluments clause

By Emily Singer

A massive group of congressional Democrats plans to file a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, alleging he’s in violation of the Constitution for keeping his stake in his foreign businesses, the Washington Post reported.

The lawsuit — filed by 196 Democratic members of Congress — says Trump is in violation of the emoluments clause, which bans lawmakers from accepting “any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state” without the consent of Congress.

The lawmakers are seeking to stop Trump from “accepting any benefits from foreign states without first obtaining congressional consent,” according to the text of the lawsuit obtained by the Washington Post.

The lawsuit comes days after the attorneys general from Maryland and Washington, D.C., also filed suit against Trump, alleging he’s in violation of anticorruption clauses in the Constitution.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) has taken the lead on the lawsuit, with Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) leading the effort in the House. No Republicans have joined the lawsuit, but Blumenthal told the Washington Post that they are invited to.

The White House has not yet responded to the lawsuit.

But White House press secretary Sean Spicer said the suit filed by the Maryland and D.C. attorneys general was about “partisan politics.”

“I think the president’s interest, as previously discussed, do not violate the emoluments clause,” Spicer said in his June 12 press briefing.

More from

Corporate Accountability

Intuit, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

In Intuit Inc v. Federal Trade Commission, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the FTC’s authority to issue cease-and-desist orders against false and misleading advertising is constitutional.
Rule of Law
June 20, 2024

Opinion | The tragedy of the Supreme Court’s bump stock ruling

Washington Post
Don’t let technicalities, or a refusal to use common sense, become the enemy of public...
By: Nina Henry
Access to Justice
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court rejects artificial limit on liability for speech-based retaliation by government officers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s Supreme Court decision in Gonzalez v. Trevino, a case in...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Civil and Human Rights
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court decision keeps the door open to accountability for police officers who make false charges

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Chiaverini v. City...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Corporate Accountability
June 20, 2024

RELEASE: In narrow ruling, Supreme Court rejects baseless effort to shield corporate-derived income from taxation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this morning’s decision at the Supreme Court in Moore v. United...
By: Brian R. Frazelle
Rule of Law
June 19, 2024

The Supreme Court’s approach on ‘history and tradition’ is irking Amy Coney Barrett

Washington (CNN) — On a Supreme Court where the conservative supermajority increasingly leans on history as a...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Devan Cole, John Fritze