Rule of Law

RELEASE: New CAC Amicus Brief on Behalf of Professors of History and Constitutional Law Shows That the Fifth Circuit’s Ruling on CFPB Funding Is at Odds with Constitutional Text and History

WASHINGTON, DC – Earlier today, the Constitutional Accountability Center filed a brief at the Supreme Court in CFPB v. Community Financial Services Association of America. Filed on behalf of scholars with expertise in constitutional law and early American history, the brief examines the text and history of the Appropriations Clause and shows that the Clause, properly understood, imposes none of the limits on Congress’s decisions about how to fund federal agencies that were the basis of the Fifth Circuit’s decision. Indeed, as the brief also shows, Congress has given agencies funding like the CFPB’s since the Founding.

CAC Senior Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle said:

Without even attempting to ground its ruling in the Constitution’s text, the Fifth Circuit decided that Congress violated the Appropriations Clause by giving the CFPB a dedicated annual budget in the law creating the agency, instead of funding the agency from year to year in annual appropriations bills. This activist decision has no basis in the text or history of the Constitution. The Appropriations Clause was meant to ensure that the people’s elected representatives in Congress—not the president, and certainly not appointed judges—have the exclusive power to decide how the government’s money is spent. The Clause allows Congress to control the executive, it does not allow judges to control Congress. At the Founding, as today, to “appropriate” money “by law” simply meant to pass legislation that authorizes spending on particular activities. That’s what Congress did when it passed the legislation creating the CFPB. And Congress has been employing funding mechanisms like the CFPB’s since 1789.

Resources:

Amicus brief in CFPB v. Community Financial Services Association of America: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/20230515111929890_CFPB-v.-CFSA-Professors-Amicus-Brief-FINAL.pdf

Brianne J. Gorod, Brian R. Frazelle, & Alex Rowell, As Wrong as It is Dangerous: The Fifth Circuit’s Decision Holding the CFPB’s Funding Structure Unconstitutional, https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/blog-as-wrong-as-it-is-dangerous-the-fifth-circuits-decision-holding-the-cfpb-funding-structure-unconstitutional/

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

 

 

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 30, 2026

Trump’s new Truth Social plan: pay $100K

NPR
Elizabeth Wydra joined the NPR podcast “The Indicator from Planet Money” to discuss potential corruption...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...
Rule of Law
July 10, 2026

July Newsletter: The Legacy of the Declaration of Independence Belongs to We the People

Rule of Law
July 7, 2026

CAC Release: DOJ Under Todd Blanche Fails to Disclose Epstein Files (Again)

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to the Trump administration’s failure to disclose the Epstein files...
By: Praveen Fernandes