Rule of Law

NEW: Whitehouse Challenges Trump’s Appointment of Whitaker as Acting AG in U.S. District Court

U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) joined U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Mazie Hirono (D-HI) on Monday in filing a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia challenging the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s appointment of Matthew Whitaker as the Acting Attorney General.

On November 7, President Trump appointed Whitaker to oversee the Department of Justice – including the Special Counsel’s investigation – in violation of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. The Senators’ complaint asks the Court to declare Whitaker’s appointment unconstitutional and to enjoin him from serving as, or carrying out the duties of, Acting Attorney General.

“The stakes are too high to allow the president to install an unconfirmed lackey to lead the Department of Justice – a lackey whose stated purpose, apparently, is undermining a major investigation into the president.  Unless the courts intercede, this troubling move creates a plain roadmap for persistent and deliberate evasion by the executive branch of the Senate’s constitutionally mandated advice and consent.  Indeed, this appointment appears planned to accomplish that goal,” said Whitehouse.

Two non-partisan, non-profit law firms represent the Senators in this case: Protect Democracy and the Constitutional Accountability Center.

According to the release from Blumenthal’s office:

“The Constitution’s Appointments Clause requires that the Senate confirm high-level federal government officials, including the Attorney General, before they exercise the duties of the office. The Framers included this requirement to ensure that senior administration officials receive scrutiny by the American people’s representatives in Congress. The Appointments Clause is also meant to prevent the President, in the words of Alexander Hamilton in Federalist 76, from appointing officers with “no other merit than that of…possessing the necessary insignificance and pliancy to render them the obsequious instruments of his pleasure.”

“Installing Matthew Whitaker so flagrantly defies constitutional law that any viewer of School House Rock would recognize it. Americans prize a system of checks and balances, which President Trump’s dictatorial appointment betrays,” Blumenthal said. “President Trump is denying Senators our constitutional obligation and opportunity to do our job: scrutinizing the nomination of our nation’s top law enforcement official. The reason is simple: Whitaker would never pass the advice and consent test. In selecting a so-called “constitutional nobody” and thwarting every Senator’s constitutional duty, Trump leaves us no choice but to seek recourse through the courts.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
November 15, 2025

Justice Jackson goes ‘her own way’ in Supreme Court’s SNAP fight

CNN
As she oversaw President Donald Trump’s emergency Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, case this...
Rule of Law
November 5, 2025

What’s at stake for Trump with Supreme Court tariff case?

Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Elizabeth Wydra, a lawyer and president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, says the stakes for...
Rule of Law
November 5, 2025

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Presidential Authority to Impose Tariffs Under Emergency Powers Law

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Learning Resources...
Rule of Law
November 4, 2025

The other arguments in Trump’s tariffs case

SCOTUS Blog
When the Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Wednesday in the challenges to the tariffs that President...
Rule of Law
November 3, 2025

A SCOTUS Bench Memo for the Trump Tariff Case: Separation of Powers, Delegation, Emergencies, and Pretext

Just Security
Soon after taking office, President Donald Trump invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Appalachian Voices v. Environmental Protection Agency

In Appalachian Voices v. Environmental Protection Agency, the United States of Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can unilaterally terminate an entire mandatory grant program created by Congress.