Federal Courts and Nominations

No Trumped-Up Case Of Judicial Bias: Victory In Williams v. Pennsylvania

Washington, DC – On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme court issued its ruling in Williams v. Pennsylvania, holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution “there is an impermissible risk of actual bias when a judge earlier had significant, personal involvement as a prosecutor in a critical decision regarding the defendant’s case,” Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

 

“James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers that, ‘[n]o man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity.’ In his majority opinion in Williams today, Justice Kennedy underscored this founding principle, saying one cannot act “as both accuser and judge in the same case.” The Court affirmed today that ‘[b]oth the appearance and reality of impartial justice are necessary to the public legitimacy of judicial pronouncements and thus to the rule of law itself.’

 

“In a time when the nation is dealing with trumped-up assertions of judicial bias based on race and ethnicity, this case provided a clear-cut example of what judicial bias really is, and we are gratified that the Court agreed.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC “friend of the court” brief in Williams v. Pennsylvania: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/williams-v-pennsylvania-us-sup-ct 

 

“Ronald Castille’s role in death-row appeal violated Constitution,” Brianne Gorod, Allentown Morning Call, March 2, 2016: http://www.mcall.com/opinion/yourview/mc-supreme-court-murder-bias-castille-gorod-yv–20160302-story.html 

 

“Trump’s Not The Only One Attacking the Judiciary,” Elizabeth Wydra, Huffington Post, June 8, 2016: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-b-wydra/trumps-not-the-only-one-a_b_10364454.html

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Rule of Law
January 20, 2025

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Immigration and Citizenship
January 15, 2025

Birthright Citizenship 101

Thank you to our partners at UnidosUS for translating this resource into Spanish. Links to PDF versions...
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates

In United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act violates the Appointments...