Rule of Law

OP-ED: The Bill of Rights needed to be updated — and it was

Most Americans know the Bill of Rights. But too few Americans know that the way we enjoy those crucial rights today is inextricably linked to the way our Constitution was transformed after the Civil War.

The first 10 amendments to the Constitution mark 10 early steps America took along what we at Constitutional Accountability Center call “the arc of constitutional progress.” Many people in the founding era opposed ratifying the Constitution’s original articles because they believed, as James Madison explained to the first Congress in 1789, it “did not contain effectual provision against encroachments on particular rights.” To remedy these objections, the Bill of Rights, Madison said, “expressly declare(s) the great rights of mankind secured under this constitution.”

Today, we know many of these rights by heart. Freedom of speech and press. Freedom from government establishment of religion and free exercise of religion. The right to be secure from unreasonable government searches and seizures. The rights to due process of law and against self-incrimination, and many others. In fact, the Ninth Amendment tells us the Bill of Rights isn’t exclusive, and that we, the people, have other rights not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

As advanced as it was for its time, however, the Bill of Rights still fell critically short. It applied only to the actions of the federal government, allowing states to run roughshod over these rights. Even worse, these promised “great rights of mankind” stood in brutally stark contrast to the institution of slavery, ringing as “hollow mockery” in the face of the most fundamental deprivations of life and liberty.

In the wake of the Civil War, however, African-Americans, abolitionists and other Americans joined together to further expound the meaning of freedom. The ratification of the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution brought about what has been called a “Second Founding,” revolutionizing our governing charter to prohibit chattel slavery, promise citizenship to all born in America, offer equal protection under the law, and protect the right to vote from racial discrimination.

America’s post-Civil War “Second Founders” updated the Bill of Rights in two ways.

First, they widened the umbrella of its majestic protections to cover everyone in America, to prevent state and local governments from violating our rights without fear of consequence. Most of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated rulings vindicating the rights set out in the Bill of Rights — cases such as New York Times v. Sullivan, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Miranda v. Arizona — are actually 14th Amendment cases. Without the 14th Amendment, states would be free to violate every single right listed in the Bill of Rights, as states in fact did to perpetuate the institution of slavery.

It is because of the effort of our Reconstruction framers that our fundamental rights are guaranteed no matter where in the United States you live. To be sure, the promise of the transformed Constitution has not always translated into a lived reality for far too many in this country. But there is power in the words generations of activists fought so hard to write into our national charter — we know what should be ours, and we demand change when constitutional promises are illusory.

Second, the 14th Amendment expanded the meaning of freedom beyond the fundamental rights in the Bill of Rights. As my colleague, Constitutional Accountability Center Civil Rights Director David Gans, has explained, the 14th Amendment’s “framers sought to safeguard fundamental rights that have no explicit textual basis in the Bill of Rights but that are crucial to equality and liberty.”

At the Second Founding, in fact, the framers of the 14th Amendment said, “It is the Declaration of Independence placed immutably and forever in our Constitution.”

The Bill of Rights, therefore, remains timeless and essential to our civic life. But it is just part of America’s struggle to become a “more perfect union.” As our ancestors taught us, that work is never finished. Through times of war and peace, and even pandemic, they showed us that America is best when the arc of our Constitution bends ever toward progress and liberation.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
January 20, 2022

Justice Gorsuch’s Abandonment of Textualism in NFIB v. OSHA

Although in 2015 Justice Kagan famously quipped “we are all textualists now,” perhaps no current...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 10, 2022

RELEASE: Judge Should Be Skeptical of Trump Attorneys’ Argument for Total Immunity for January 6 Acts

WASHINGTON – Following oral argument over motions to dismiss lawsuits brought by Capitol Police officers...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
December 12, 2021

OP-ED: Counterpoint: The Bill of Rights Needed to be Updated—and It Was

InsideSources
Most Americans know the Bill of Rights. But too few Americans know that the way...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Rule of Law
December 17, 2021

OP-ED: On the anniversary of the 13th Amendment’s certification, remembering the nation’s ‘Second Founding’ | Opinion

Philadelphia Inquirer
Recognized as part of the Constitution on Dec. 18, 1865, the amendment banned slavery and...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Rule of Law
December 16, 2021

Constitutional Progress: Reflecting and Planning for 2022

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra and CAC staff reflect on the highlights of our work this...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
December 14, 2021

RELEASE: Trump Loses: Judge Rules Former President May Not Block His Tax Records from Congressional Committee

WASHINGTON – On news today that a Washington, D.C.-based federal judge ruled against former President...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra