Rule of Law

PODCAST (People For the American Way): The Progressive Happy Hour: A New Lawsuit on Trump’s Unconstitutional Foreign Emoluments

Since Donald Trump took office, his business dealings have raised serious legal and ethical questions about the conflicts of interest between his businesses and the American public.

In the June 22 episode of “The Progressive Happy Hour,” co-host Drew Courtney and PFAW’s senior director of outreach and public engagement Diallo Brooks sat down with Kristine Kippins, director of policy at the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), to discuss their lawsuit to hold Trump accountable for his violations of the foreign emoluments clause.

Kristine emphasized that the Constitution’s framers intentionally drafted the foreign emoluments provision to protect the American people from corruption by requiring Congress to affirmatively consent to the president accepting any benefits from foreign states. “Because [Trump] retained interest in the Trump organization, he is profiting from the presidency [by] selling real estate, receiving trademarks and regulatory benefits from foreign states all over the world where the Trump organization has an interest.” CAC represents 200 members of Congress for Trump having accepted foreign payments without their required consent; the organization is currently awaiting a decision from a federal judge on whether the parties have legal standing to proceed.

Kristine encouraged activists to hold the president accountable, and said, “Be active on social media with the hashag #NoOneAboveTheLaw. Tell your members of Congress how important this lawsuit is. And be vigilant about federal judicial nominations. This president has no regard for the law and the Republican congress has no interest in checking him, so courts are our last line of defense to be defenders of the rule of law. The future of the republic rests on a judiciary comprised only of fair-minded constitutionalists, and from what we’ve seen so far, we have reason to be nervous.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Nebraska v. EPA

In Nebraska v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit is considering the legality of the EPA’s latest motor vehicle emissions standards. 
Rule of Law
January 20, 2025

RELEASE: Trump’s Shameful Pardons and Commutations Cannot Change the Facts of January 6th

WASHINGTON, DC – Upon reports that President Donald Trump has issued pardons and commutations for individuals...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research

In Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research, the Supreme Court is considering whether a federal law that requires the FCC to establish programs making internet access more affordable is unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine. 
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

TV (C-SPAN): Elizabeth Wydra on Trump Sentencing in New York Hush Money Case

C-SPAN
[embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n7g_TJRor4[/embed] Constitutional Accountability Center's Elizabeth Wydra talked about President-elect Trump's sentencing in his New York...
Rule of Law
January 14, 2025

Civil Rights-Era Abuses Could Return to the FBI Under Kash Patel | Opinion

Newsweek
With the recent start of the 119th Congress and the imminent beginning of a second Trump administration,...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
January 10, 2025

CAC (Bloomberg): CAC’s Wydra Joins Bloomberg’s Balance of Power to Discuss TikTok Supreme Court Case

Bloomberg TV