Rule of Law

PODCAST (People For the American Way): The Progressive Happy Hour: A New Lawsuit on Trump’s Unconstitutional Foreign Emoluments

Since Donald Trump took office, his business dealings have raised serious legal and ethical questions about the conflicts of interest between his businesses and the American public.

In the June 22 episode of “The Progressive Happy Hour,” co-host Drew Courtney and PFAW’s senior director of outreach and public engagement Diallo Brooks sat down with Kristine Kippins, director of policy at the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), to discuss their lawsuit to hold Trump accountable for his violations of the foreign emoluments clause.

Kristine emphasized that the Constitution’s framers intentionally drafted the foreign emoluments provision to protect the American people from corruption by requiring Congress to affirmatively consent to the president accepting any benefits from foreign states. “Because [Trump] retained interest in the Trump organization, he is profiting from the presidency [by] selling real estate, receiving trademarks and regulatory benefits from foreign states all over the world where the Trump organization has an interest.” CAC represents 200 members of Congress for Trump having accepted foreign payments without their required consent; the organization is currently awaiting a decision from a federal judge on whether the parties have legal standing to proceed.

Kristine encouraged activists to hold the president accountable, and said, “Be active on social media with the hashag #NoOneAboveTheLaw. Tell your members of Congress how important this lawsuit is. And be vigilant about federal judicial nominations. This president has no regard for the law and the Republican congress has no interest in checking him, so courts are our last line of defense to be defenders of the rule of law. The future of the republic rests on a judiciary comprised only of fair-minded constitutionalists, and from what we’ve seen so far, we have reason to be nervous.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 29, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...