President Obama’s Jobs Glitch

 

By Al Kamen

October 21, 2011

The gavel comes down

An excellent junket for federal judges is no more. The controversial Foundation for Research on Economics and Environment (FREE) — which since the early ’90s has taken hundreds of federal judges to beautiful Montana for a week of what critics called corporation-funded wining, dining and bemoaning the evils of environmental laws — is closing up shop.

The head of the foundation has decided to no longer invite the judges, Legal Times reported this week. The “handwriting had been on the wall” in recent years, said Doug Kendall, head of the pro-environment Constitutional Accountability Center, which has been leading opposition to FREE’s program.

In 2006, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. approved rules requiring FREE to disclose its corporate donors and judges who go to the seminars to report them within 30 days. In addition, a judicial ethics committee ruled that judges couldn’t sit on FREE’s board. The moves may have put too much sunlight on the junkets.

Not to despair. Black-robed folks looking for free junkets and cash can still give speeches at international or national conventions, universities, and other fine venues.

More from

Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Supreme Court

Trump v. CASA, Trump v. Washington, and Trump v. New Jersey

In three cases, the Supreme Court is considering whether to partially stay preliminary injunctions blocking the Trump Administration’s executive order purporting to limit birthright citizenship to children who have at least one parent who is...
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Access to Justice
U.S. Supreme Court

Beck v. United States

In Beck v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether servicemembers may sue the United States for money damages pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act when they are injured in the course of...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.