President’s Lawful Immigration Executive Action Now Ready For Supreme Court Review

Washington, DC – On news this evening that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has issued a ruling upholding a District Court’s injunction against President Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, or DAPA, Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

“While tonight’s disappointing ruling is hardly unexpected,” said CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra, “it is important that the Fifth Circuit finally issued its ruling in time for the Supreme Court to grant review during the current Term.”

 

“After a flawed procedural ruling earlier this year, the panel majority shows that it continues to misunderstand both the President’s immigration initiative and the role of the President in enforcing immigration law,” said CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod. “With its immigration action, the Obama Administration was simply doing what the executive branch does all the time – determining how best to enforce the nation’s laws – and following the same approach as Presidents from both parties.  

 

“The Supreme Court recognized just three and a half years ago that a ‘principal feature of the removal system is the broad discretion exercised by immigration officials,’ including ‘whether it makes sense to pursue removal at all.’  The Supreme Court should reaffirm that principle, recognizing that the President’s immigration initiative is simply an exercise of that lawful discretion, and allow the program to be implemented immediately.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Texas v. U.S. on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress, urging the court of appeals to lift the injunction and allow DAPA to proceed: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Texas_v_United_States_Amicus_Brief.pdf

 

“Time for the Fifth Circuit to rule,” Brianne Gorod, The Hill, October 21, 2015: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/257487-time-for-the-fifth-circuit-to-rule

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
September 5, 2024

“Moore v. Harper, Evasion, and the Ordinary Bounds of Judicial Review”

Election Law Blog
David Gans, Brianne Gorod, and Anna Jessurun have posted this draft on SSRN (forthcoming, Boston College Law Review)....
By: Brianne J. Gorod, David H. Gans, Anna Jessurun, Rick Hasen
Rule of Law
September 5, 2024

Reflections on my Kendall Fellowship

On my first day at the Constitutional Accountability Center, I worked on a brief about...
By: Jess Zalph
Rule of Law
September 2, 2024

Transgender rights, ghost guns, porn ID cases on Supreme Court docket; stakes high in next term

The Washington Times
The Supreme Court is still on its three-month summer recess but already has loaded its docket with...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Alex Swoyer
Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202

In In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Access to Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Mick v. Gibbons

In Mick v. Gibbons, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering whether the doctrine of state sovereign immunity applies to third party subpoenas.