Rule of Law

RELEASE: Appeals Court Deals Body Blow to Checks and Balances in Flynn Case

WASHINGTON – On news that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a writ of mandamus to Judge Sullivan, ordering him to dismiss criminal charges against General Michael Flynn as requested by President Trump’s Department of Justice, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

Today’s ruling from a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, ordering a lower-court judge to dismiss criminal charges against retired General Michael Flynn—charges to which Flynn has already pleaded guilty—would essentially erase a vital check by the judiciary on the power of the executive branch. The full D.C. Circuit should take up today’s ruling and reverse it.

As CAC argued in a brief on behalf of criminal law professors, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a) was designed to prevent corrupt or politically motivated dismissals that would harm the public interest. The Rule provides, in part, “The government may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment, information, or complaint.” (emphasis added). Those words, “with leave of court,” mean that the presiding judge has a say in whether Attorney General Barr should be allowed to simply drop the matter, an act that would aid one of President Trump’s stalwart allies by essentially giving him a “get out of jail free” card. 

However, today’s ruling—written by Judge Neomi Rao, a Trump appointee—barely addresses the history of Rule 48(a). Instead, by ignoring the text and history of Rule 48(a), it essentially revokes the lower-court judge’s discretion and deals a body-blow to checks and balances in a case that clearly cries out for independent judgment.

#

Resources:

CAC brief in United States v. Flynn (District Court), on behalf of criminal law professors in support of neither party: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/united-states-v-flynn/ 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org. 

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 20, 2025

CAC Release: Attempts to Intimidate Public Officials Doing Their Jobs Should Concern All Americans

WASHINGTON, DC –  Upon press reports of the Trump Department of Justice’s decision to charge Congresswoman...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...