Federal Courts and Nominations

RELEASE: CAC Commends Lower Court Judgeship Bills

WASHINGTON – On today’s news that Congressman Hank Johnson, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet, introduced the District Court Judgeships Act of 2021, and on yesterday’s news that Senators Chris Coons and Todd Young introduced bipartisan legislation to authorize additional judgeships, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

“CAC commends the sponsors and cosponsors of these critical pieces of legislation, both of which aim to address a problem that has been documented by countless organizations and institutions, including the nonpartisan Judicial Conference headed by Chief Justice John Roberts — our federal court system does not have enough judges to efficiently carry out its job of administering justice.

As CAC stated in congressional testimony earlier this year, Congress has not significantly increased the number of federal judgeships since 1990, even as our nation has grown in population by a third, and even as the number of cases filed has increased.  This has consequences.  As of March 31, 2020, there were nearly 30,000 civil cases pending for more than three years, and 99% of those cases were before a federal district court judge.

If justice delayed is justice denied, then failing to increase the number of lower court judges is nothing less than a denial of justice to the American people.”



CAC Statement for Hearing on “The Need for New Lower Court Judgeships, 30 Years in the Making”
Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet
United States House of Representatives, February 24, 2021

“The Judicial Conference Rightly Continues to Request Additional Judgeships” Becca Damante, March 18 2021

Lower Court Expansion Letter to HJC-2.24.21.

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
August 27, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Responds to SCOTUS Eviction Moratorium Decision and Troubling Shadow Docket

WASHINGTON – Following the Supreme Court’s decision to end the pandemic-related residential eviction moratorium, Constitutional Accountability Center...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 28, 2021

Analysis: U.S. Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ favored religion and Trump

WASHINGTON, July 28 (Reuters) - As midnight approached on the eve of the U.S. Thanksgiving...
By: David H. Gans, By Lawrence Hurley, Andrew Chung
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2021

OP-ED: From Qualified Immunity to Voting Rights, the Supreme Court Guts Civil Rights Laws

The American Prospect
The Court’s right-wingers elevate the rights of government officials over those it is constitutionally required...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 12, 2021

Steady term of the Supreme Court ends with politically fraught cases that reveal divisions

USA Today
WASHINGTON – For months, the Supreme Court appeared to rise above partisan strife – becoming a place where...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By John Fritze
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2021

Post-Trump supreme court appears willing to embrace judicial activism

The Guardian
Court issued some near-unanimous decisions this term, but one legal expert suspects rightwing justices are...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Ed Pilkington
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 2, 2021

Barrett moves Supreme Court to the right, but cautiously

Washington Post
Justice Amy Coney Barrett moved the Supreme Court’s center of gravity further to the right...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Robert Barnes