Federal Courts and Nominations

RELEASE: CAC Responds to SCOTUS Eviction Moratorium Decision and Troubling Shadow Docket

WASHINGTONFollowing the Supreme Court’s decision to end the pandemic-related residential eviction moratorium, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement: 

The Supreme Court’s decision in the eviction moratorium case is wrong on substance, and troubling in process.  By striking down a Biden Administration eviction moratorium newly tailored to meet the deadly challenge of a faster-spreading variant of COVID-19, the Supreme Court has rendered a decision that imperils the housing and lives of countless members of the American family, and this unsigned order lacked the full briefing, oral argument, and transparency we expect from our nation’s highest court.   

 Taken in tandem with the other shadow docket decision earlier this week — allowing to go into effect a district court order that requires the Biden administration to try to reinstate a Trump-era policy that forces many people to endure a dangerous wait in Mexico for their asylum hearing — the contrast with Trump-era shadow docket orders is striking.  During the Trump administration, the Supreme Court time and again deferred to executive branch decision-making, but now it appears to be applying different standards to the decisions of the Biden administration.  Respect for the high court as an institution is at stake.  But reputational harm pales in comparison to the human cost.  As Justice Breyer’s dissent (joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan) rightly reminds us, the court’s actions “impact the health of millions.”


CAC Brief: Tiger Lily, LLC v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 


“Attacks on the Eviction Moratorium Are Attacks on the Administrative State,” Miriam Becker-Cohen, CAC Blog, July 8, 2021


 CAC’s Testimony to Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, August 20, 2021




More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 31, 2023

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert says

Fox News
Some democrats compare Justice Clarence Thomas to ‘Uncle Tom’ and house slave in ‘Django Unchained’
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Brianna Herlihy
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 7, 2023

In Her First Term, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Came to Play’

The New York Times
From her first week on the Supreme Court bench in October to the final day...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Adam Liptak
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s continuing march to the right

Major legal rulings that dismantled the use of race in college admissions, undermined protections for...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Tierney Sneed
Federal Courts and Nominations
June 25, 2023

Federal judge defends Clarence Thomas in new book, rejects ‘pot shots’ at Supreme Court

A federal appeals court judge previously on short lists for the Supreme Court is taking the rare...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
May 1, 2023

Supreme Court, done with arguments, turns to decisions

Roll Call
The justices have released opinions at a slow rate this term, and many of the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Michael Macagnone