Federal Courts and Nominations

RELEASE: CAC Responds to SCOTUS Eviction Moratorium Decision and Troubling Shadow Docket

WASHINGTONFollowing the Supreme Court’s decision to end the pandemic-related residential eviction moratorium, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement: 

The Supreme Court’s decision in the eviction moratorium case is wrong on substance, and troubling in process.  By striking down a Biden Administration eviction moratorium newly tailored to meet the deadly challenge of a faster-spreading variant of COVID-19, the Supreme Court has rendered a decision that imperils the housing and lives of countless members of the American family, and this unsigned order lacked the full briefing, oral argument, and transparency we expect from our nation’s highest court.   

 Taken in tandem with the other shadow docket decision earlier this week — allowing to go into effect a district court order that requires the Biden administration to try to reinstate a Trump-era policy that forces many people to endure a dangerous wait in Mexico for their asylum hearing — the contrast with Trump-era shadow docket orders is striking.  During the Trump administration, the Supreme Court time and again deferred to executive branch decision-making, but now it appears to be applying different standards to the decisions of the Biden administration.  Respect for the high court as an institution is at stake.  But reputational harm pales in comparison to the human cost.  As Justice Breyer’s dissent (joined by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan) rightly reminds us, the court’s actions “impact the health of millions.”


CAC Brief: Tiger Lily, LLC v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 


“Attacks on the Eviction Moratorium Are Attacks on the Administrative State,” Miriam Becker-Cohen, CAC Blog, July 8, 2021


 CAC’s Testimony to Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, August 20, 2021




More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
July 30, 2021

RELEASE: CAC Commends Lower Court Judgeship Bills

WASHINGTON – On today’s news that Congressman Hank Johnson, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 28, 2021

Analysis: U.S. Supreme Court’s ‘shadow docket’ favored religion and Trump

WASHINGTON, July 28 (Reuters) - As midnight approached on the eve of the U.S. Thanksgiving...
By: David H. Gans, By Lawrence Hurley, Andrew Chung
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 16, 2021

OP-ED: From Qualified Immunity to Voting Rights, the Supreme Court Guts Civil Rights Laws

The American Prospect
The Court’s right-wingers elevate the rights of government officials over those it is constitutionally required...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 12, 2021

Steady term of the Supreme Court ends with politically fraught cases that reveal divisions

USA Today
WASHINGTON – For months, the Supreme Court appeared to rise above partisan strife – becoming a place where...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By John Fritze
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 9, 2021

Post-Trump supreme court appears willing to embrace judicial activism

The Guardian
Court issued some near-unanimous decisions this term, but one legal expert suspects rightwing justices are...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Ed Pilkington
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 2, 2021

Barrett moves Supreme Court to the right, but cautiously

Washington Post
Justice Amy Coney Barrett moved the Supreme Court’s center of gravity further to the right...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Robert Barnes