Health Care

RELEASE: CAC Tells Court: Dissolve Fifth Circuit Stay of Vaccinate-or-Test Policy 

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center filed a brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in support of the U.S. Government’s motion to dissolve a stay of the vaccinate-or-test policy issued by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA).

CAC’s brief focuses, in part, on Founding-era practice, showing that the earliest Congresses routinely delegated power to executive department agencies to, among other things, enforce the nation’s first quarantine legislation in the wake of yellow fever outbreaks, administer the new government’s first direct tax, and manage the process of paying the national debt after the Revolutionary War.

“OSHA’s vaccinate-or-test policy is necessary to protect employees in America from the grave danger of COVID-19,” said CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod. “The Fifth Circuit concluded that the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 would represent an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power if interpreted to authorize the OSHA policy. This argument has no grounding in the Constitution’s text and history, and presents a vision of the nondelegation doctrine that would—to use the words of a landmark Supreme Court case—‘cripple the government, and render it unequal to the object for which it is declared to be instituted.’”

#

Resources:

CAC brief in In Re: OSHA Rule on COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing, 86 Fed. Reg. 61402: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/OSHA-CAC-Brief-Final.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Health Care

Health Care
May 30, 2024

Oklahoma to Ask Court to Unblock HHS Family Planning Money

Bloomberg Law
Oklahoma says HHS can’t require referral for illegal abortion Family planning grant loss expected to...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Health Care
 

Oklahoma v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

In Oklahoma v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit is considering whether Title X reproductive healthcare clinics in Oklahoma can defy the federal...
Health Care
April 24, 2024

RELEASE: Justices Grapple with Scope and Effect of Conflict Between EMTALA and Idaho’s Near-Total Abortion Ban

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Idaho v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Health Care
March 29, 2024

Amicus Briefs Filed in Support of EMTALA, The Federal Right to Emergency Care, Including Abortion, in Idaho v. United States and Moyle v. United States

National Women's Law Center
A broad coalition of amici filed 27 briefs to the U.S. Supreme Court in support...
Health Care
U.S. Supreme Court

Idaho v. United States

In Idaho v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether EMTALA, a federal law requiring hospitals to provide stabilizing treatment to patients experiencing medical emergencies, preempts Idaho’s near-total abortion ban in situations where abortion...
Health Care
March 22, 2024

Supreme Court to rule on FDA approval of abortion drug mifepristone

Fox News
Call it wishful thinking or strategic amnesia, but just two years removed from its controversial...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, Shannon Bream, Bill Mears