Rule of Law

RELEASE: Fact-Free Impeachment Hearing Appears to Take Shape

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the House Oversight Committee’s announcement of its witnesses and plans for a September 28, 2023 hearing relating to an impeachment inquiry of President Biden, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

Impeachment is a potent constitutional mechanism for accountability, but like most powerful tools, it must be wielded with responsibility and care.  And impeachment requires a solid factual predicate.  This impeachment inquiry fails on every level, and tomorrow’s hearing does nothing to change that.  As at least one prominent Republican House member has written in a Washington Post op-ed, and as countless other Republican elected officials have commented publicly, no evidence has been produced to date that links President Biden to an impeachable offense.  And yet, tomorrow’s hearing offers not a single fact witness.  That such a hearing expends congressional bandwidth mere days before a likely government shutdown—one that would hobble critical social service programs, imperil the ability to pay our troops and disaster-relief personnel, and likely unsettle our financial markets—simply adds to the irresponsibility.  The American people deserve better.

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: At the D.C. Circuit, Everyone Agrees that the Constitution Does Not Permit the President to Unilaterally Shutter the CFPB

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
May 16, 2025

CAC Release: Skepticism About Trump Administration’s Power Grab at Labor Rights Agencies at D.C. Circuit Argument This Morning

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

J. Doe 4 v. Musk

In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland is considering whether Elon Musk’s role in DOGE violates the Appointments Clause and the Constitution’s separation of powers.
Rule of Law
May 9, 2025

Dodd-Frank Authors Join Warren, Waters to Challenge CFPB Firings

Bloomberg Law
Top Democrats, Dodd-Frank namesakes cite separation of powers Amicus brief highlights CFPB’s 2008 financial crisis...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought

In National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally shut down the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump

In American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is considering whether the Trump administration’s efforts to unilaterally reorganize the federal government are constitutional...