Rule of Law

RELEASE: Impeachment Trial: “House Managers Made a Case Trump’s Attorneys Cannot Refute” 

“House Managers have presented in damning detail the threat to democracy that former President Trump posed to the country on January 6.” — CAC President Elizabeth Wydra

WASHINGTON – Following the conclusion of day three of President Trump’s historic second Senate impeachment trial, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction: 

House Managers have presented in damning detail the threat to democracy that former President Trump posed to the country on January 6. They have made a case that Trump’s attorneys cannot refute.  

Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol and stop the counting of electoral votes, threatening the lives of all those within the US Capitol, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Pence.  Seven people, including three Capitol Police officers, died and more than a hundred law enforcement officers injured. The last time our Capitol was sacked was when the British did so in the War of 1812. Not even during the Civil War was Congress disrupted in its counting of electoral college votes. With images and facts we had seen before, and many others we had not, House Managers have shaken the American people to their core.    

One would imagine that the Senators, hearing and watching this presentation, would be shaken to their core, too, and solemnly do the right thing: Stand up for the Constitution and our country, and convict. But unfortunately, it is apparent that some—perhaps most—Senate Republicans are intent on abdicating their duty.  

This would be a historic shame. A president who has engaged in such dangerous and deadly incitement of insurrection should be convicted and disqualified from further office, regardless of whether he is a member of your preferred party. (For heaven’s sake, even if he were a member of your very own family, the facts compel conviction.) This is not a political game. It is no less than a vote on the future of American democracy. 

#

Resources 

Elizabeth Wydra discusses President Trump’s second impeachment trial on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal, February 9, 2021: https://www.c-span.org/video/?508803-3/washington-journal-john-malcolm-elizabeth-wydra-preview-2nd-trump-impeachment-trial

CAC RELEASE: “In Second Trump Impeachment Trial, Senate Republicans Face Stark Choices,” Elizabeth Wydra, February 4, 2012: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-in-second-trump-impeachment-trial-senate-republicans-face-stark-choices/

CAC RELEASE: Historic Second Impeachment of President Trump: A Critical Step Forward, But Congress’s Work Is Not Done,” Elizabeth Wydra, January 13, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-historic-second-impeachment-of-president-trump-a-critical-step-forward-but-congresss-work-is-not-done/  

CAC RELEASE: “Impeach, Remove, and Bar Donald Trump From Holding Federal Office Again,” Elizabeth Wydra, January 7, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/release-impeach-remove-and-bar-donald-trump-from-holding-federal-office-again/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

### 

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
August 8, 2026

Now Its Your Turn

Amicus
David. H. Gans’ June 2026 appearance on the Amicus podcast was cited in a later episode...
Rule of Law
August 3, 2026

Reflections on My Fellowship

My fellowship experience at CAC has been deeply rewarding. Over the course of the fellowship,...
Rule of Law
July 30, 2026

Trump’s new Truth Social plan: pay $100K

NPR
Elizabeth Wydra joined the NPR podcast “The Indicator from Planet Money” to discuss potential corruption...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board

In Jackler v. Merit Systems Protection Board, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration can ignore critical civil service laws when removing Immigration Judges.
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Comey v. Department of Justice

In Comey v. Department of Justice, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is considering whether the Attorney General can fire an Assistant U.S. Attorney in contravention of legal protections...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security

In DHS Probationary Employees 1 Class v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally reshape the federal government through...