Rule of Law

RELEASE: January 6 Committee Unanimously Votes to Subpoena Trump, Taking Another Critical Step Toward Accountability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following this afternoon’s hearing of the bipartisan January 6th Select Committee, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

After summarizing the results of an investigation that has lasted longer than a year, the bipartisan Select Committee ended its hearing by unanimously voting to subpoena testimony from former President Trump.  The decision to subpoena Trump is a critical step toward obtaining additional information and holding him accountable.  No one should be above the law.

This afternoon we heard from each Select Committee member, reviewing prior findings from the past eight hearings.  Anyone who seriously grapples with the information the Select Committee has presented must acknowledge the strength of the evidence that Donald Trump and his MAGA allies engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results and disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.

The hearing also reinforced the seriousness of the ongoing threat to our democracy and the freedoms we cherish.  As Chairman Thompson, Vice Chair Cheney, and others warned, the events of January 6th illustrate the need for a number of steps—including legislation—to ensure that a threat to the peaceful transfer of power never again comes so close to succeeding.  Our republic must be secured.



TV (Fox LiveNow): CAC’s Wydra Discusses Seventh Hearing of January 6th Committee, July 12, 2022:

TV (ABC News Live): CAC’s Wydra Discusses Testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson to Bipartisan January 6th Committee, June 28, 2022:

TV (NBC News Now): CAC’s Wydra joins Joshua Johnson to Discuss Day 3 of January 6 Committee Hearings, June 16, 2022:


Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at


More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
November 30, 2022

Garland praises Oath Keepers verdict, won’t say where Jan. 6 probe goes

The Washington Post
Justice Dept. will weigh seditious conspiracy conviction in deciding whether to pursue other high-profile Trump...
By: Praveen Fernandes, By Perry Stein, Spencer S. Hsu, and Devlin Barrett
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Biden v. Nebraska

In Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court is considering whether to allow the Biden Administration’s student debt-relief program to go into effect.
Rule of Law
November 22, 2022

RELEASE: With Supreme Court Action, Trump Tax Records Should Be Turned Over to House Ways and Means Committee Without Delay

WASHINGTON, DC – On news that the Supreme Court denied former President Trump’s application for...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
November 9, 2022

RELEASE: Justices Skeptical of ICWA Challengers’ Broad Anti-Commandeering Argument

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Haaland v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Rule of Law
November 2, 2022

Originalism Demands Only One Answer in the Supreme Court’s Big Elections Case

Moore v. Harper, which will be argued before the Supreme Court on December 7, has...
By: David H. Gans
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Moore v. Harper

In Moore v. Harper, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Elections Clause prevents a state court from enforcing voting rights guarantees enshrined in a state constitution to limit a state legislature’s regulation of congressional...