Rule of Law

RELEASE: Judge Should Be Skeptical of Trump Attorneys’ Argument for Total Immunity for January 6 Acts

WASHINGTONFollowing oral argument over motions to dismiss lawsuits brought by Capitol Police officers and Members of Congress for damages relating to injuries former President Trump allegedly caused by his actions on and leading up to January 6, 2021, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President Praveen Fernandes issued the following statement:

While the events of January 6, 2021, might have been extraordinary, the constitutional accountability principle at issue in these cases is anything but. No one is above the law.

In today’s lengthy hearing, Judge Mehta asked insightful and pointed questions of all parties. The former president’s attorneys tried to make the case that Trump’s remarks and acts on and leading up to January 6 were part of Trump’s official duties as president. But as the amicus briefs we filed in these cases on behalf of legal scholars explained, Trump’s conduct in allegedly inciting a riot at the Capitol to forcibly disrupt a session of Congress fell far outside the outer perimeter of his official responsibility.

In short, today’s hearing should have only reinforced the points that we made in those briefsabsolute presidential immunity does not shield a former president, sued in his personal capacity, from damages liability for unofficial conduct.

We hope for a prompt ruling from Judge Mehta.



Why Trump Cannot Hide Behind Presidential Immunity for Inciting an Insurrection, Lawfare, Dayna Zolle, August 2, 2021:


Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at


More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
November 30, 2022

Garland praises Oath Keepers verdict, won’t say where Jan. 6 probe goes

The Washington Post
Justice Dept. will weigh seditious conspiracy conviction in deciding whether to pursue other high-profile Trump...
By: Praveen Fernandes, By Perry Stein, Spencer S. Hsu, and Devlin Barrett
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Biden v. Nebraska

In Biden v. Nebraska, the Supreme Court is considering whether to allow the Biden Administration’s student debt-relief program to go into effect.
Rule of Law
November 22, 2022

RELEASE: With Supreme Court Action, Trump Tax Records Should Be Turned Over to House Ways and Means Committee Without Delay

WASHINGTON, DC – On news that the Supreme Court denied former President Trump’s application for...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
November 9, 2022

RELEASE: Justices Skeptical of ICWA Challengers’ Broad Anti-Commandeering Argument

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Haaland v....
By: Smita Ghosh
Rule of Law
November 2, 2022

Originalism Demands Only One Answer in the Supreme Court’s Big Elections Case

Moore v. Harper, which will be argued before the Supreme Court on December 7, has...
By: David H. Gans
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Moore v. Harper

In Moore v. Harper, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Elections Clause prevents a state court from enforcing voting rights guarantees enshrined in a state constitution to limit a state legislature’s regulation of congressional...