Rule of Law

RELEASE: Justices Reject Tenth Amendment Challenges to ICWA and Confirm Supremacy of Federal Law

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision this morning in Haaland v. Brackeen and consolidated cases in which the Supreme Court was considering the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law passed to prevent state courts from unnecessarily separating Indian families and communities using state adoption and foster care systems, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh issued the following reaction:

In a victory for tribal sovereignty, the Supreme Court rejected a broad set of constitutional challenges to ICWA.  Among other things, the Court held that the law does not violate the Supreme Court’s anti-commandeering doctrine.  Consistent with the constitutional history laid out in CAC’s amicus brief in the case, the Court rejected the argument that Congress runs afoul of an anti-commandeering prohibition when it makes rules that apply in state courts, as ICWA’s rules do.  “This argument,” Justice Barrett explained, “runs headlong into the Constitution.”

The Court also rejected the challengers’ argument that ICWA’s recordkeeping provisions violate the Tenth Amendment.  Echoing CAC’s brief, the Court held that these requirements related to state court proceedings are entirely consistent with the kinds of obligations that Congress has imposed on state actors since the Founding.

Significantly, today’s decision preserves ICWA, which plays an important role in protecting tribal citizenship.  It does something else important as well: it ensures that Congress has the power to create standards that state courts must follow, consistent with the constitutional system that the Framers put in place.

##

Resources:

Case page in Haaland v. Brackeen: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/haaland-v-brackeen/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
September 16, 2026

CAC Release: Plaintiffs File Opposition Brief Explaining Why Trump’s Efforts to Evade Accountability in Domestic Emoluments Clause Suit Should Be Rejected

WASHINGTON, DC – The Constitutional Accountability Center and Gelber Schachter & Greenberg jointly filed an...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Gerald Greenberg
Rule of Law
September 10, 2026

September 2026 Newsletter: Protecting People’s Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law Across the Country

This newsletter spends a lot of time on the U.S. Supreme Court, but here at CAC, we’re...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Perlmutter v. Blanche

In Perlmutter v. Blanche, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether the President can unilaterally remove the Register of Copyrights.
Rule of Law
August 18, 2026

Not Above the Law Creator Call

CAC's Praveen Fernandes and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse spoke about what accountability looks like now that...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Sheldon Whitehouse
Rule of Law
August 29, 2026

Interview with Praveen Fernandes, Vice President at the Constitutional Accountability Center

AbbyTheAttorney
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes spoke to Abby Winters about the weaponization of the Department...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Abby Winters
Rule of Law
September 1, 2026

Open Letter: A Network of 175+ Organizations Uniting to Defend the Rule of Law and Protect Vulnerable Communities

Nonprofits Together
CAC signed onto an open letter with a coalition of civil society, advocacy, and nonpartisan...