Rule of Law

RELEASE: Kirtz Argument Reveals Tension Between Expansive Application of Sovereign Immunity Canon and Honest Textualism

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz, a case in which the Court is considering whether private individuals can sue the federal government for violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Constitutional Accountability Center Appellate Counsel Miriam Becker-Cohen issued the following reaction:

This morning’s argument revealed the tension between the government’s strained interpretation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Supreme Court’s repeated admonition that Congress does not have to use “magic words” to waive the federal government’s immunity from suit.

Although the Act clearly waives sovereign immunity, imposing liability on any “person” and defining “person” to include “any . . . government or governmental subdivision or agency,” the government argued that it should nonetheless win because the sovereign immunity canon puts the thumb on the scale in favor of the government when statutes are ambiguous regarding whether immunity has been waived.

But as we explained in our amicus brief, the sovereign immunity canon does not alter the Court’s approach to statutory interpretation in the first place. Rather, as Justice Gorsuch pointed out, the “first step” to interpreting a statutory waiver of sovereign immunity is to ascertain what the statutory provisions “mean.” Where, as in the Fair Credit Reporting Act, there is no ambiguity, the sovereign immunity canon simply has no role to play.

The result here thus should be simple: Congress waived sovereign immunity, and private individuals who allege that the federal government has violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act should get their day in court.

##

Resources:

Case page in Department of Agriculture Rural Development Rural Housing Service v. Kirtz: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/united-states-department-of-agriculture-rural-development-rural-housing-service-v-kirtz/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

##

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents criminal case

Kansas Reflector
MILWAUKEE — The federal classified documents case against former President Donald Trump was dismissed Monday...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Ashley Murray