Rule of Law

RELEASE: No, President Trump May Not Unilaterally Adjourn Congress

WASHINGTON – After President Trump announced his intention unilaterally to adjourn Congress, claiming that he could “exercise my constitutional authority to adjourn both chambers of Congress,” Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

This is simply not how our Constitution works, and President Trump should not distort constitutional meaning to further pack the courts with dangerous ideologues. While Article II, Section 3 of our Constitution references a President’s ability to convene Congress in certain limited “extraordinary” circumstances and to adjourn both houses of Congress “in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment….” there is no disagreement between the House and Senate. In short, the President is supported by neither the text nor history of these constitutional provisions. As we reel from the damage that the COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked upon our nation’s people, it’s a shame to see President Trump use this as an opportunity to do damage to our nation’s founding charter, as well.

#

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
April 25, 2025

When does President Donald Trump’s defiance of courts in deportation case cross the line into a constitutional crisis?

Cronkite News
WASHINGTON – Presidents of both parties have pushed the limits of their authority throughout history....
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump

In American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump Administration’s efforts to unilaterally dismantle USAID are constitutional and comply with federal law.
Rule of Law
April 14, 2025

Congressional Democrats Fight Back Against Trump’s Attacks on the FTC and Independent Agencies

Cory Booker Senate
Today, Senate and House Democrats filed an amicus brief opposing President Donald Trump’s unlawful attempt...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Slaughter v. Trump

In Slaughter v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s attempted firing of Commissioners Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the Federal Trade Commission was illegal.
Rule of Law
April 29, 2025

Is the US headed for a constitutional crisis?

Deutsche Welle
US President Donald Trump is issuing executive orders on a daily basis. So far, he’s...
Rule of Law
April 10, 2025

April 2025 Newsletter: Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation

Supporting New Scholarship for the Next Generation On March 20 and 21, CAC was thrilled...