Rule of Law

RELEASE: No, President Trump May Not Unilaterally Adjourn Congress

WASHINGTON – After President Trump announced his intention unilaterally to adjourn Congress, claiming that he could “exercise my constitutional authority to adjourn both chambers of Congress,” Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

This is simply not how our Constitution works, and President Trump should not distort constitutional meaning to further pack the courts with dangerous ideologues. While Article II, Section 3 of our Constitution references a President’s ability to convene Congress in certain limited “extraordinary” circumstances and to adjourn both houses of Congress “in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment….” there is no disagreement between the House and Senate. In short, the President is supported by neither the text nor history of these constitutional provisions. As we reel from the damage that the COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked upon our nation’s people, it’s a shame to see President Trump use this as an opportunity to do damage to our nation’s founding charter, as well.

#

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 25, 2021

Launching Originalism Watch and Exploring Progressive Originalism

When it’s done correctly, originalism points more often than not to progressive—not conservative—outcomes. CAC President Elizabeth Wydra, CAC...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Elizabeth B. Wydra, Mark Joseph Stern
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Tiger Lily, LLC v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

In Tiger Lily, LLC v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is considering whether a federal law permits the CDC to impose a federal eviction...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In Terkel v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the federal eviction moratorium, implemented to curb the spread of COVID-19, falls within Article...
Rule of Law
April 27, 2020

OP-ED: Executive Branch Inconsistency on Congressional Standing

Take Care Blog
On Tuesday, April 28, the en banc D.C. Circuit will hear telephonic oral argument in...
By: Ashwin Phatak
Rule of Law
March 26, 2020

OP-ED: Trump’s Misplaced Reliance on Justice Department Memoranda to Protect His Financial Records

Lawfare
This term, the Supreme Court will decide Trump v. Vance, a blockbuster case concerning the legality...
By: Ashwin Phatak
Rule of Law
April 29, 2021

8th Annual Home Stretch at the Supreme Court

Host: Constitutional Accountability Center