Federal Courts and Nominations

RELEASE: Senator Hawley’s “Fauxriginalist” Rationale on Rao

“It is Hawley’s brand of what we call ‘fauxriginalism’—a selective application and distortion of the Constitution’s text, history and structure to achieve conservative results—that we oppose.” — Praveen Fernandes

WASHINGTON – Following the explanation this morning by Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) of his vote on the nomination of Neomi Rao to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Constitutional Accountability Center Vice President for Public Engagement Praveen Fernandes issued the following statement:

Today, Senator Hawley voted with his Republican Senate Judiciary Committee colleagues to advance to the Senate floor the nomination of Neomi Rao to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In justifying his vote, Senator Hawley said that Ms. Rao gave him assurances that she would interpret the Constitution according to its text and history.

True fidelity to the history and text of the whole Constitution—including the many amendments that have allowed us to realize more fully our nation’s great promise—requires understanding the document’s steady movement toward greater inclusion and more meaningful equality, an undeniably progressive arc. So, if Senator Hawley thinks—as we suspect he does given his views on such issues as reproductive rights and LGBTQ equality—that fidelity to the Constitution’s text and history leads only to conservative results, he is seriously mistaken. We would have no quarrel with originalism, fairly applied. It is Hawley’s brand of what we call “fauxriginalism”—a selective application and distortion of the Constitution’s text, history and values to achieve conservative results—that we oppose.

Frankly, we would welcome a true commitment to the text, history, and values of the whole Constitution, but after examining Ms. Rao’s record, we find it lacking.

#

Resources:

CAC letter of opposition to Rao nomination, February 28, 2019: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CAC-Rao-Letter-of-Opposition-to-Full-Senate.pdf

“Originalism, Fauxriginalism, and Embracing the Constitution,” Praveen Fernandes, February 7, 2019: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/originalism-fauxriginalism-and-embracing-the-constitution/

Link to Fauxriginalism graphic: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Fauxriginalism_blogimage-1.png

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 31, 2023

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert says

Fox News
Some democrats compare Justice Clarence Thomas to ‘Uncle Tom’ and house slave in ‘Django Unchained’
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Brianna Herlihy
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 7, 2023

In Her First Term, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Came to Play’

The New York Times
From her first week on the Supreme Court bench in October to the final day...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Adam Liptak
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s continuing march to the right

CNN
Major legal rulings that dismantled the use of race in college admissions, undermined protections for...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Tierney Sneed
Federal Courts and Nominations
June 25, 2023

Federal judge defends Clarence Thomas in new book, rejects ‘pot shots’ at Supreme Court

CNN
A federal appeals court judge previously on short lists for the Supreme Court is taking the rare...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra
Federal Courts and Nominations
May 1, 2023

Supreme Court, done with arguments, turns to decisions

Roll Call
The justices have released opinions at a slow rate this term, and many of the...
By: Brianne J. Gorod, By Michael Macagnone