Federal Courts and Nominations

Roberts’ Supreme Court Is More Pro-Business Than Any Other Court Since World War II: Study

By Caroline Fairchild        

 

It’s no secret big business has some good friends in Congress. But a new study shows that the Supreme Court has also served as an important ally to the corporate world.

 

The current Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., has been more favorable to businesses than any other court since at least World War II, according to a recent study published in April’s Minnesota Law Review.

 

The researchers also found that five of the justices serving on the Roberts Court are among the top 10 most pro-business justices in the past 65 years. In fact, the two justices who were found to be most likely to vote in favor of businesses are Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. Justice Sonia Sotomayor is the only current justice among the 10 least favorable justices to business.

 

The study, which analyzed more than 2,000 court decisions since 1946, was conducted by Lee Epstein, a professor of law and political science at the University of Southern California, economist William M. Landes from the University of Chicago and Richard A. Posner, a Chicago federal appeals court judge.

 

The current court has voted in favor of big business in many high profile cases.

 

In one of its more controversial decisions, the Supreme Court rejected limits on campaign donations made by corporations. The court’s ruling in the Citizens United case allowed corporations to spend hundreds of millions of dollars without restraint in the latest campaign season. The court held that political spending, either by a corporation or an individual, is protected under the First Amendment and cannot be curbed by the government.

 

In 2011, the court blocked a major sex discrimination lawsuit against Walmart, making it more difficult for future large-scale bias claims against big employers to reach the Supreme Court.

 

Just last month, the Supreme Court turned its back to a class action lawsuit against Comcast alleging that the company’s monopoly in parts of the Philadelphia area allowed it to hike up prices unfairly. The court argued that there was not enough evidence of the damages.

 

The Supreme Court’s support of the Chamber Of Commerce has also increased under the current Supreme Court, according to a report by liberal judicial group the Constitutional Accountability Center. The chamber has won almost 70 percent of the cases it has gotten involved with during the Roberts Court. This compares to the chamber’s 56 percent success rate during the Rehnquist court from 1994 to 2005.

 

(h/t the New York Times)

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche