Rule of Law

RELEASE: Supreme Court Decision in Animal Welfare Case Is Important Victory for Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, in which the Supreme Court upheld the legality of California’s animal welfare law, Proposition 12, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Senior Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle had this reaction:

Today’s decision is not just a victory for the animals that many pork companies confine in tiny cages, it is a victory for democracy itself, rejecting an aggressive corporate effort to conscript the courts in overruling the will of the voters.

While states may not pass laws that discriminate against products from other states, the Court made clear that a state’s health and safety regulations do not become unconstitutional simply because out-of-state companies may have to spend money obeying those laws in order to sell products within the state. Justice Gorsuch’s opinion also firmly rejected the idea that judges may strike down a state’s consumer protection laws “based on nothing more than their own assessment of the relevant law’s costs and benefits.”

Embracing the arguments presented in our amicus brief for law professors Barry Friedman and Daniel Deacon, the opinion stresses that the so-called “dormant Commerce Clause,” on which the pork producers based their lawsuit, is fundamentally about preventing state economic protectionism. It does not give judges a license “to reassess the wisdom of state legislation.” Policy choices like these instead “belong to the people and their elected representatives.”

##

Resources:

Amici curiae brief in Ross v. National Pork Producers Council: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/national-pork-producers-council-v-ross/

Brian R. Frazelle, The Supreme Court’s Ruling on California’s Pig Crate Law Could Be a Gift to Corporate America, The New Republic, https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-californias-pig-crate-law-could-be-a-gift-to-corporate-america/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
May 7, 2026

Bondi Corroded DOJ’s Integrity. Congress Must Now Demand Change

Bloomberg Law
CAC Vice President Praveen Frenandes and former DC Bar President Patrick McGlone co-authored an article...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Patrick McGlone
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget

In Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Office of Management and Budget, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is considering whether President Trump’s Office of Management and...
Rule of Law
April 25, 2026

The Chilling Message Behind Trump’s Attack On The SPLC

Huffington Post
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes was interviewed by HuffPost about Trump's attacks on the Southern...
Rule of Law
April 22, 2026

CAC Release: Targeting Civil Rights Groups Leaves All Americans Less Safe

WASHINGTON, DC – In response to yesterday’s indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center, Constitutional...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
April 20, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Whether Investor Harm Is a Prerequisite to an Award of Disgorgement in a Civil Action Brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s oral argument at the Supreme Court in Sripetch v. Securities...
By: Simon Chin
Rule of Law
April 15, 2026

Court to contemplate SEC’s use of disgorgement in securities enforcement

SCOTUSBlog
CAC's amici brief on behalf of legal scholars in Sripetch v. SEC was featured in SCOTUSblog. Read more...