Rule of Law

RELEASE: Supreme Court Decision in Animal Welfare Case Is Important Victory for Democracy

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, in which the Supreme Court upheld the legality of California’s animal welfare law, Proposition 12, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Senior Appellate Counsel Brian Frazelle had this reaction:

Today’s decision is not just a victory for the animals that many pork companies confine in tiny cages, it is a victory for democracy itself, rejecting an aggressive corporate effort to conscript the courts in overruling the will of the voters.

While states may not pass laws that discriminate against products from other states, the Court made clear that a state’s health and safety regulations do not become unconstitutional simply because out-of-state companies may have to spend money obeying those laws in order to sell products within the state. Justice Gorsuch’s opinion also firmly rejected the idea that judges may strike down a state’s consumer protection laws “based on nothing more than their own assessment of the relevant law’s costs and benefits.”

Embracing the arguments presented in our amicus brief for law professors Barry Friedman and Daniel Deacon, the opinion stresses that the so-called “dormant Commerce Clause,” on which the pork producers based their lawsuit, is fundamentally about preventing state economic protectionism. It does not give judges a license “to reassess the wisdom of state legislation.” Policy choices like these instead “belong to the people and their elected representatives.”

##

Resources:

Amici curiae brief in Ross v. National Pork Producers Council: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/national-pork-producers-council-v-ross/

Brian R. Frazelle, The Supreme Court’s Ruling on California’s Pig Crate Law Could Be a Gift to Corporate America, The New Republic, https://www.theusconstitution.org/news/the-supreme-courts-ruling-on-californias-pig-crate-law-could-be-a-gift-to-corporate-america/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco

In Cristosal Human Rights v. Marocco, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to defund and dismantle the Inter-American Foundation violates federal law and...
Rule of Law
March 18, 2025

Feds, NLRB’s Wilcox urge quick ruling on reinstatement

HR Dive
The defendants said a district court’s ruling “works a grave harm to the separation of...
Rule of Law
March 18, 2025

RELEASE: At Oral Argument, D.C. Circuit Judges Contend with Dangerous and Unprecedented Claims for Unlimited Executive Power over Longstanding Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the D.C. Circuit court today in Wilcox v....
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

New York v. Trump

In New York v. Trump, the First Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral and categorical decision to freeze all federal funding to programs that do not align with its policy priorities violates federal...
Rule of Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Pacito v. Trump

In Pacito v. Trump, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to dismantle the United States Refugee Assistance Program (USRAP), including by suspending all USRAP funding, violates federal law and the...
Rule of Law
March 13, 2025

March 2025 Newsletter: Ongoing Challenges and New Victories