Second Circuit Issues Major Ruling Allowing Global Warming Lawsuit to Go Forward, Keeps Courthouse Doors Open to Environmental Plaintiffs

Mystery of the “Missing Sotomayor Opinion” Solved

On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled broadly in favor of eight states, the City of New York, and several environmental organizations, allowing them to proceed with a lawsuit against six major power companies charging that their greenhouse gas emissions constitute a public nuisance.  The ruling overturned a district court decision dismissing the case on the ground that the lawsuit amounted to a non-justiciable political question.

Doug Kendall, President of Constitutional Accountability Center, issued this statement on the Second Circuit’s ruling:

Yesterday’s opinion is profoundly significant, not only for its recognition of the climate crisis, but also for its affirmation of the historical role that courts have played in addressing environmental problems through their common law authority.  Written by two Republican-appointees, the opinion is a welcome challenge to efforts led by other conservatives, on the Supreme Court and off, to define good judging by a willingness to narrow the role of the federal courts and shut the courthouse doors to those seeking justice, including in environmental cases.

The Court’s ruling also solves what Sonia Sotomayor’s critics called the “mystery of the missing Sotomayor opinion.”  Then-Second Circuit Judge Sonia Sotomayor was part of a three judge panel that originally heard the case in June 2006, but not part of the ruling issued yesterday for the obvious reason that she is now sitting on the Supreme Court.  According to Kendall: “we now know what was taking the panel so long: it was producing a comprehensive 139-page ruling on a profoundly important set of topics.  This opinion was clearly worth the wait.”    

* * * * * * *

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.  CAC’s more detailed discussion of yesterday’s Second Circuit ruling in Connecticut v. American Electric Power Company, Inc. can be found here on our Warming Law blog.

Contact: Doug Kendall
202-296-6889, Ext. 3

More from

Immigration and Citizenship
June 25, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Misunderstands Immigration Law—and the Presumption of Extraterritoriality—in Decision about Asylum-Seekers at the Border

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Noem v. Al Otro...
By: Smita Ghosh
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: In Deeply Disappointing Decision, Supreme Court Ignores Ordinary Meaning of Statute and Denies Victims of Torture Their Day in Court

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Cisco Systems v. Doe,...
By: Harith Khawaja
Rule of Law
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court Decision on Excessive Fines Clause Reaches the Wrong Result, But Gets the Standard Right

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pung v. Isabella County,...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Access to Justice
June 23, 2026

CAC Release: Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Undermines Important Right Created by Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Landor v. Louisiana Department...
By: Brianne J. Gorod
Rule of Law
June 22, 2026

The Supreme Court Is About to Decide Four Cases Defining Trump’s Power

The Wall Street Journal
CAC President Elizabeth Wydra spoke to the Wall Street Journal about the major decisions left...
Rule of Law
June 21, 2026

Trump DOJ in CRISIS MODE

Legal AF
CAC Vice President Praveen Fernandes joined the Legal AF podcast to discuss Todd Blanche's nomination...