Christopher Kang takes charge of Obama’s judicial nomination process.

 

By David Ingram

 

Christopher Kang is a veteran of the judge wars. At their height during the George W. Bush administration, he was a top aide to the Senate’s No. 2 Democrat and advised the effort to block some of Bush’s most conservative federal appeals court nominees.

 

Now Kang has a different mission: lead the selection of President Barack Obama’s nominees and get them confirmed.

 

It’s the kind of switch not everyone could pull off, because not all Republicans are ready to let bygones be bygones on the treatment of past judicial nominees. But Kang, 35, is making an attempt. He started full-time in August as a senior counsel in the White House running the president’s judicial nominations process.

 

….

 

REALISTIC AMBITIONS

 

With 92 vacancies on the federal courts, Kang isn’t thinking yet about filling the entire judiciary. He said his goal for the rest of Obama’s term is to get the number of vacancies back to where it was in January 2009, at about 55. He thinks that’s realistic, given that 27 nominees are awaiting final Senate votes after getting positive support in committee. “If they were to confirm those tomorrow, you could cut the vacancy rate by almost a third and make a pretty significant dent toward getting to 55,” he said.

 

Douglas Kendall, president of the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center, said he believes Kang understands the urgency of acting before the presidential campaign gets fully underway. “Chris is focused and energized and has the White House’s full support for the proposition that we have got to get the vacancy rate down,” he said.

 

….

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 23, 2023

BLOG: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Lessons From Reconstruction

The Supreme Court is ailing, but you wouldn’t know it from Chief Justice Roberts’s 2022...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 30, 2022

RELEASE: How Do We Fix an Ailing Court? Reconstruction Provides Critical Lessons

WASHINGTON – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center is releasing new scholarship by CAC Civil Rights Director...
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 29, 2022

ISSUE BRIEF: Court Reform and the Promise of Justice: Lessons from Reconstruction

Lewis and Clark Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2023 The Supreme Court is broken....
By: David H. Gans
Federal Courts and Nominations
August 15, 2022

BLOG: Building the Next Generation of Constitutional Progressives

This summer, CAC welcomed four interns to learn our method of understanding the progressive promise...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 14, 2022

Supreme Court Review: The Future of Supreme Court

Host: NYCLA’s Civil Rights and Liberties Committee and NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform Committee
Program Chair: Elliot Dolby Shields, Co-chair NYCLA’s Civil Rights Committee; Chair, NYCLA’s Supreme Court Reform...
Participants: David H. Gans, Elliot Dolby Shields, Amir Ali, Alicia Bannon, Katherine M. Franke, Rachel Rebouche